Background Roughly 5% of patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) have a blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injury (BBMI). Determining the need for operative management in these patients can be challenging when hemodynamically stable. Single center studies have proposed scoring systems based on CT findings to guide management. Our study aimed to determine the predictability of abdominopelvic CT scan (CT A/P) findings in conjunction with clinical exam to determine the necessity of operative intervention for BBMI. Methods Patients presenting from 2017 to 2022 to the University of South Alabama Level 1 Trauma Center after motor vehicle collision were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with CT findings suggestive of BBMI were further analyzed, noting CT findings, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), shock index, abdominal exam, operative or nonoperative management, and intraoperative intervention. Results 1098 patients with BAT underwent CT A/P. 139 patients had ≥1 finding suggestive of BBMI. 38 patients underwent surgical exploration and 30 had surgically confirmed BBMI. 27 patients required intervention for BBMI. Univariate analysis indicated that pneumoperitoneum ( p < 0.0001), active extravasation of contrast ( p = 0.0001), hemoperitoneum without solid organ injury (SOI) ( p < 0.0001), peritonitis ( p < 0.0001), and mesenteric stranding( p < 0.05) were significantly associated with intervention. Conclusion In total, 30 patients had surgically confirmed BBMI. Active extravasation, pneumoperitoneum, hemoperitoneum without SOI, mesenteric stranding, and peritonitis were significant indicators of BBMI requiring intervention. CT and clinical findings cannot reliably predict the need for surgical intervention without ≥1 of these findings. Initial nonoperative management with serial clinical exams should be strongly considered to reduce incidence of nontherapeutic laparotomies.
Background: With trends of obesity increasing, plastic surgeons are resecting larger weights from larger patients. Published literature has demonstrated the association between body mass index (BMI) and resection weight to postsurgical complications; however, these relationships are unclear in a population that is primarily overweight or obese. Our study examines these relationships to assist plastic surgeons in identifying high-risk patients and discussing preoperative measures to decrease the likelihood of surgical complications. Methods: We performed a retrospective electronic medical record review of a cohort of 182 bilateral reduction mammoplasty procedures performed at a single institution over a four-year period. Patient data were obtained and correlated with postoperative complications. Results: Within our identified patient cohort, 95% were classified as either overweight or obese. Incidence of complications was 51%, with wound dehiscence having the highest incidence of 36.26%. Using a multivariate regression, our analysis found statistical significance between surgical complications and both smoking status and BMI (P = 0.042 and P = 0.025, respectively). Smokers had an increased risk of complications with an odds ratio of 5.165. For every additional 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI, the odds for surgical complication increased by 1.079. In a subanalysis focusing on wound dehiscence, the use of postoperative drains was a protective factor (P = 0.0065). Conclusions: Our study population, with a high average BMI and smoking status, demonstrated a statistically significant increase in postsurgical complications. These findings will help counsel obese patients preoperatively on their increased risk of complications.
Background Opioids remain the mainstay treatment of acute pain caused by trauma. The lack of evidence driven prescribing creates a challenging situation for providers. We hypothesized that the implementation of a trauma discharge opioid bundle (TDOB) would decrease the total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed at discharge while maintaining pain control. Methods This was a pre-post study of adult trauma patients before and after implementation of a TDOB to guide the prescription of opioids and discharge prescription education in patients discharged from a level one trauma center. The pre-group and post-group, included consecutively discharged patients from September through November in 2018 and 2019. The primary outcome was the total MME prescribed at discharge. Results A total of 377 patients met inclusion criteria. One hundred and fifty-one patients were included in the pre-group and 226 in the post-group. The total MME prescribed at discharge (225 ± [150-300] pre vs 200 ± [100-225] post, P = < .001) and maximum MME/day (45 ± [30-45] vs 30 ± [20-45], P = .004) were significantly less in the post-group. Incidence of outpatient refills within fourteen days were similar. More non-opioid pain adjuncts were prescribed post-intervention and discharge pain education was provided more frequently. Conclusion The implementation of a TDOB significantly reduced the MME prescribed at discharge without increasing the number of opioid refills.
Traumatic aortic injuries in children and adolescents are rare, and even more rare are blunt traumatic injury to the abdominal aorta in this population. Therefore, there are few reports discussing the presentation and repair of such injuries, especially within the pediatric population. We report the successful repair of traumatic abdominal aortic transection in a 10-year-old female after a high speed MVC. She arrived in extremis with a seatbelt sign and was taken emergently for damage control laparotomy with subsequent postoperative CT findings of aortic transection/dissection at L3 with active extravasation. She immediately underwent open thrombectomy of the bilateral iliac arteries, and repair of her aortic injury with a 12 × 7 mm Hemashield interposition graft extending just distal to the IMA and 1 cm proximal to the aortic bifurcation. There are little data regarding long-term outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing different aortic repair techniques, and further research is needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.