The responses of photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, activities of antioxidant enzymes and lipid membrane peroxidation of two contrasting Picea asperata Mast. populations to 30% of full sunlight (shade) and full sunlight (sun) were investigated under well-watered and drought conditions. Two contrasting populations were from the wet and dry climate regions in China, respectively. For both populations tested, drought resulted in lower needle relative water content (RWC), CO 2 assimilation rate (A), stomatal conductance (gs) and effective PSII quantum yield (Y), and higher non-photochemical quenching (qN), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities as well as malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and electrolyte leakage in sun plants, whereas these changes were not significant in shade plants. For the wet climate population, shade plants showed higher chlorophyll contents (Chla, Chlb and Chla þ b) than sun plants under both well-watered and drought conditions. Our study results implied that shade, applied together with drought, ameliorated the detrimental effects of drought. On the other hand, compared with the wet climate population, the dry climate population was more tolerant to drought in the sun treatment, as indicated by less decreases in A and mass-based leaf nitrogen content (N mass ), more responsive stomata, greater capacity for non-radiative dissipation of excitation energy as heat (analysed by qN), and higher level of antioxidant enzyme activities as well as lower MDA content and electrolyte leakage. These results demonstrated that the different physiological strategies were employed by the P. asperata populations from contrasting climate regions when the plants were exposed to drought and shade.
The effects of exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) on the acclimation of Picea asperata to water deficit were investigated in two populations originating from wet and dry climate regions of China. Exogenous ABA was sprayed onto the leaves, and changes in plant growth and structure, gas exchange, water use efficiency (WUE), endogenous ABA content, and antioxidant enzyme levels were monitored. The results demonstrated that ABA application affected the two P. asperata populations in different ways during the water deficit. ABA application resulted in significantly lower CO(2) assimilation rates (A) under water deficit in plants from the wet climate population, whereas there were no significant changes in this parameter in the dry climate population. On the other hand, ABA application significantly decreased the dry shoot biomass, stomatal conductance (g(s)), transpiration rate (E), and malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and it significantly increased the leaf mass per area (LMA), root/shoot ratio (Rs), fine root/total root ratio (Ft), WUE, ABA content, and the superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and catalase (CAT) activities under water-deficit conditions in the dry climate population, whereas ABA application did not significantly affect these parameters in the wet climate population. The results clearly demonstrated that sensitivity to an exogenous ABA application is population-dependent in P. asperata. Direct evidence is presented that variation in physiological mechanisms rather than different rates of ABA absorption explain the population differentiation in the sensitivity to exogenous ABA, and that the physiological basis for the amplified response to water deficit caused by exogenous ABA, present mainly in the dry climate population, is related to internal ABA accumulation. These results provide evidence for adaptive differentiation between populations of P. asperata, and they support the expected relationship between environmental heterogeneity and the magnitude of plastic responses in plant populations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.