IntroductionTelemedicine and blood pressure (BP) self-monitoring conduces to management of hypertension. Recent hypertension guidelines highly recommended single pill combination (SPC) for the initial treatment of essential hypertension. Based on this fact, an SPC-based telemedicine titration regimen with BP self-monitoring could be a better way in managing hypertension. This trial aims to elucidate whether telemedicine combined with BP self-monitoring is superior to self-monitoring alone during hypertension management.Methods and analysisThis study will be a multicentred, open-labelled, randomised controlled trial. A minimum sample of 358 hypertensive patients with uncontrolled BP from four centres will be included. The intervention group will include BP self-monitoring and tele-monitoring plus a free SPC-based telemedicine titration therapy for 6 months, they will be recommended to take BP measurements at least once every 7 days, in the meantime, researchers will call to give a consultation on lifestyle or titration advice once a fortnight. The control group will be required to self-monitor BP at the same time interval as intervention group, without any therapy change. Primary outcome of the trial will be the difference in systolic blood pressure at 6-month follow-up between intervention and control group, adjusted for baseline variables. Secondary outcomes such as BP control rate, major adverse cardiovascular events, medication adherence, quality of life will be investigated.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was granted by Ethical Committee of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital (SHSY-IEC-4.1/20-194/01). The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed literature, and to policy-makers and healthcare partners.Trial registration numberChiCTR2000037217.

Background Much less is known about the importance of blood pressure (BP) trajectories concerning the incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) in people with disabilities. Our aim was to evaluate this association. Methods This cohort study surveyed 5711 adults from the Shanghai Disability Health Survey from June 2012 to June 2019. The latent class growth mixture model was used to examine distinct BP trajectories. We evaluated the association of BP trajectories with the risk of CHD by Cox proportional hazard models. The model for CHD risk fitted to BP trajectories was compared with models fitted to other BP-related indicators by goodness-of-fit, discrimination, and calibration. Results During a median follow-up of 71.74 months, 686 cases (median age was 49.03 (54.49, 58.55) years, 51.90% female) with CHD were identified, with a cumulative incidence of 12.01%. Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were categorized into three classes, respectively. A statistically significant association was only observed between SBP trajectories and CHD. Compared with the normotensive stable SBP group (n = 1956), the prehypertension-stable group (n = 3268) had a higher risk (adjust hazards ratio (aHR) = 1.266, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.014–1.581), and the stage 1 hypertension-decreasing group (n = 487) had the highest risk (aHR = 1.609, 95%CI 1.157–2.238). Among the BP-related indicators, the SBP trajectory was the strongest predictor of new-onset CHD. Findings were similar when sensitivity analyses were conducted. Conclusions SBP trajectory was a more important risk factor for CHD than other BP-related indicators and stringent BP control strategies may be effective for primary CHD prevention in the disabled population.

Objective Previous studies had demonstrated that disability increases mortality in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, for people who had been disabled but do not have baseline cardiovascular disease, there is still limited data on how they might develop CHD. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and predictors of CHD in people with disabilities. Methods We conducted a 7-year retrospective study utilizing data from the Shanghai Comprehensive Information Platform for Persons with Disabilities Rehabilitation. Subjects aged over 18 years with at least four annual complete electronic health records were included. The primary outcome was CHD, defined as ischemic heart disease or myocardial infarction. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare cumulative CHD for sub-populations, stratified by age, gender, and the classification of disabilities. Cox regression was used to identify the potentially important factors. Results Out of 6419 persons with disabilities, 688 CHD cases (mean age 52.95 ± 7.17 years, male 52.2%) were identified, with a cumulative incidence of 10.72% and an incidence density of 15.15/1000 person-years. The incidence density of CHD is higher in the male gender, people over 45 years, and those with physical disabilities. Male (HR = 1.294, 95% CI, 1.111–1.506), hypertension (HR = 1.683, 95% CI, 1.405–2.009), diabetes mellitus (HR = 1.488, 95% CI, 1.140–1.934), total cholesterol (HR = 1.110, 95% CI, 1.023–1.204), and physical disabilities (HR = 1.122, 95% CI, 1.019–1.414) were independently associated with CHD. Conclusion The findings indicate that the incidence of CHD differs across disability categories rather than the severity of disability. People with physical disabilities had significantly higher risks for the development of CHD. The underlying physiological and pathological factors need to be further studied.