No abstract

Introduction Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block has been discussed widely in spine surgery. The aim of our study is to evaluate analgesic efficacy and safety of TLIP block in spine surgery. Method We performed a quantitative systematic review. Randomized controlled trials that compared TLIP block to non-block care or wound infiltration for patients undergoing spine surgery and took the pain or morphine consumption as a primary or secondary outcome were included. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption during 0-24-hour. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain intensity, rescue analgesia requirement, and adverse events. Result 9 randomized controlled trials with 539 patients were included for analysis. Compared with non-block care, TLIP block was effective to decrease the opioid consumption (WMD -16.00; 95%CI -19.19, -12.81; p<0.001; I2 = 71.6%) for the first 24 hours after the surgery. TLIP block significantly reduced postoperative pain intensity at rest or movement at various time points compared with non-block care, and reduced rescue analgesia requirement ((RR 0.47; 95%CI 0.30, 0.74; p = 0.001; I2 = 0.0%) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR 0.58; 95%CI 0.39, 0.86; p = 0.006; I2 = 25.1%). Besides, TLIP block is superior to wound infiltration in terms of opioid consumption (WMD -17.23, 95%CI -21.62, -12.86; p<0.001; I2 = 63.8%), and the postoperative pain intensity at rest was comparable between TLIP block and wound infiltration. Conclusion TLIP block improved analgesic efficacy in spine surgery compared with non-block care. Furthermore, current literature supported the TLIP block was superior to wound infiltration in terms of opioid consumption.

Introduction: Perioperative use of ketamine has been discussed widely in many kinds of surgery. The aim of our study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term benefits and safety of ketamine after breast surgery. Method: We performed a quantitative systematic review. We included randomized controlled trials that compared intravenous administration of ketamine to a placebo control group, or compared bupivacaine in combination with ketamine to bupivacaine alone in thoracic paravertebral blocks or pectoral blocks among patients undergoing breast surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opioid consumption during the 0-to 24-hour postoperative period, the effect on postmastectomy pain syndrome, the effect on postoperative depression, and the adverse events associated with the use of ketamine.

Background: Perioperative intravenous lidocaine has been reported to have analgesic and opioid-sparing effects in many kinds of surgery. Several studies have evaluated its use in the settings of spine surgery. The aim of the study is to examine the effect of intravenous lidocaine in patients undergoing spine surgery. Methods: We performed a quantitative systematic review. Databases of PubMed, Medline, Embase database and Cochrane library were investigated for eligible literatures from their establishments to June, 2019. Articles of randomized controlled trials that compared intravenous lidocaine to a control group in patients undergoing spine surgery were included. The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption and the length of hospital stay. Result: Four randomized controlled trials with 275 patients were included in the study. postoperative pain compared with control was reduced at 6 hours after surgery (WMD −0.50, 95%CI, −0.76 to −0.25, P < .001), at 24 hours after surgery (WMD −0.50, 95%CI, −0.70 to −0.29, P < .001) and at 48 hours after surgery (WMD −0.57, 95%CI, −0.96 to −0.17, P = .005). The effect of intravenous lidocaine on postoperative opioid consumption compared with control revealed a significant effect (WMD −15.36, 95%CI, −21.40 to −9.33 mg intravenous morphine equivalents, P < .001). Conclusion: This quantitative analysis of randomized controlled trials demonstrated that the perioperative intravenous lidocaine was effective for reducing postoperative opioid consumption and pain in patients undergoing spine surgery. The intravenous lidocaine should be considered as an effective adjunct to improve analgesic outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery. However, the quantity of the studies was very low, more research is needed.

BackgroundThe preoperative elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was reported to be associated with poorer outcomes after cancer and cardiovascular surgeries. It is unclear, however, if the predictive value is particular or if it may be applied to other types of surgery. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of preoperative NLR levels for morbidity and mortality after various surgery and determine an optimal threshold for NLR.MethodsWe conducted a cohort analysis on patients receiving surgery at Sichuan University West China Hospital between 2018 and 2020. Multivariable piecewise regression analysis were used to determine the optimal cutoff value of NLR. Subgroup analysis were performed to verify the correlation. Sensitivity analysis was used to explore the effect of different thresholds.ResultsWe obtained data from 136,347 patients. The optimal cutoff of NLR was determined as 3.6 [95% CI (3.0, 4.1)] by piecewise regression method. After multivariable adjustment, preoperative high NLR remained significantly associated with increased in-hospital mortality (aOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.90–2.52; p &lt; 0.001) and ICU admission after surgery (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.59–1.79; p &lt; 0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed the predictive value of high NLR in multiple surgical subgroups, including general, orthopedic, neurosurgical, and thoracic surgery subgroups, otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery, and burn plastic surgery. A NLR threshold of 3.6 gave excellent predictive value, whether employed alone or added in an extended model.ConclusionsIn conclusion, the association of elevated NLR with higher mortality and ICU admission can be extended to a wider range of procedures. NLR threshold of 3.6 could provide good prognostic value for the prognostic model.