No abstract

Large scale genomic aberrations including duplication, deletion, translocation, and other structural changes are the cause of a subtype of hereditary genetic disorders and contribute to onset or progress of cancer. The current prime editor, PE2, consisting of Cas9-nickase and reverse transcriptase enables efficient editing of genomic deletion and insertion, however, at small scale. Here, we designed a novel prime editor by fusing reverse transcriptase (RT) to nuclease wild-type Cas9 (WT-PE) to edit large genomic fragment. WT-PE system simultaneously introduced a double strand break (DSB) and a single 3′ extended flap in the target site. Coupled with paired prime editing guide RNAs (pegRNAs) that have complementary sequences in their 3′ terminus while target different genomic regions, WT-PE produced bi-directional prime editing, which enabled efficient and versatile large-scale genome editing, including large fragment deletion up to 16.8 megabase (Mb) pairs and chromosomal translocation. Therefore, our WT-PE system has great potential to model or treat diseases related to large-fragment aberrations.

Prime editors consisting of Cas9-nickase and reverse transcriptase enable targeted precise editing of small DNA pieces, including all 12 kinds of base substitutions, insertions and deletions, while without requiring double-strand breaks or donor templates. Current optimized prime editing strategy (PE3) uses two guide RNAs to guide the performance of prime editor. One guide RNA carrying both spacer and templating sequences (pegRNA) guides prime editor to produce ssDNA break and subsequent extension, and the other one produces a nick in the complementary strand. Here, we demonstrated that positioning the nick sgRNA nearby the templating sequences of the pegRNA facilitated targeted large fragment deletion and that engineering both guide RNAs to be pegRNAs to achieve bi-direction prime editing (Bi-PE) further increase the efficiency by up to 16 times and improved the accuracy of editing products by 60 times. In addition, we showed that Bi-PE strategy also increased the efficiency of simultaneous conversion of multiple bases but not single base conversion over PE3. In conclusion, Bi-PE strategy expanded the editing scope and improved the efficiency and the accuracy of prime editing system, which might have a wide range of potential applications.

Base editing tools enabled efficient conversion of C:G or A:T base pairs to T:A or G:C, which are especially powerful for targeting monogenic lesions. However, in vivo correction of disease-causing mutations is still less efficient because of the large size of base editors. Here, we designed a dual adeno-associated virus (AAV) strategy for in vivo delivery of base editors, in which deaminases were linked to Cas9 through the interaction of GCN4 peptide and its single chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody. We found that one or two copies of GCN4 peptide were enough for the assembly of base editors and produced robust targeted editing. By optimization of single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) that target phenylketonuria (PKU) mutation, we were able to achieve up to 27.7% correction in vitro . In vivo delivery of this dual AAV base editing system resulted in efficient correction of PKU-related mutation in neonatal mice and subsequent rescue of hyperphenylalaninemia-associated syndromes. Considering the similarity between Cas9 proteins from different organisms, our delivery strategy will be compatible with other Cas9-derived base editors.

Directed base substitution with base editing technology enables efficient and programmable conversion of C:G or A:T base pairs to T:A or G:C in the genome. Although this technology has shown great potentials in a variety of basic research, off‐target editing is among one of the biggest challenges toward its way to clinical application. Base editing tools, especially the tools converting C to T, caused unpredictable off‐target editing throughout the genome, which raise the concern that long‐term application of these tools would induce genomic instability or even tumorigenesis. To overcome this challenge, we designed an inducible base editing tool that was active only in the presence of a clinically safe chemical, rapamycin. In the guidance of structural information, we designed four split‐human APOBEC3A (A3A) ‐BE3 base editors in which these A3A deaminase enzymes were split at sites that were opposite to the protein‐nucleotide interface. We showed that by inducible deaminase reconstruction with a rapamycin responsible interaction system (FRB and FKBP); three out of four split‐A3A‐derived base editors showed robust inducible base editing. However, in the absence of rapamycin, their editing ability was dramatically inhibited. Among these split editors, splicing at Aa85 of A3A generated the most efficient inducible editing. In addition, compared to the full‐length base editor, the splitting did not obviously alter the editing window and motif preference, but slightly increased the product purity. We also expanded this strategy to another frequently used cytosine deaminase, rat APOBEC1 (rA1), and observed a similar induction response. In summary, these results demonstrated the concept that splitting deaminases is a practicable method for timely controlling of base editing tools.