Hartmann's procedure, colonic resection with an end colostomy and rectal closure, is used in a variety of surgical emergencies. It is a common surgical procedure that is often practiced in patients with colonic obstruction and colonic perforation, resolving the acute clinical situation in the majority of cases. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure with restoration of bowel continuity occurs in a significantly low percentage of patients. There are several reasons contributing to the fact that many patients remain with a permanent colostomy following Hartmann's procedure. These include factors related to the patients' clinical status but also to the significant difficulty and morbidity related to the surgical reversal of Hartmann's procedure. The aim of this study was to review the factors related to the fairly low percentage of patients undergoing Hartmann's reversal as well as surgical techniques that could help surgeons restore intestinal continuity following Hartmann's procedure and deal with the postoperative outcomes.

Many patients do not have restoration of bowel continuity after undergoing Hartmann's procedure. Hartmann's reversal is associated with a significant postoperative morbidity. Surgeons and patients should be aware of the possibility that the colostomy might become permanent.

Background Patient attendance at emergency departments (EDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak has decreased dramatically under the "stay at home" and "lockdown" restrictions. By contrast, a notable rise in severity of various surgical conditions was observed, suggesting that the restrictions coupled with fear from medical facilities might negatively impact non-COVID-19 diseases. This study aims to assess the incidence and outcome of complicated appendicitis (CA) cases during that period. Methods A retrospective study comparing the rate and severity of acute appendicitis (AA) cases during the COVID-19 initial outbreak in Israel during March and April of 2020 (P20) to the corresponding period in 2019 (P19) was conducted. Patient data included demographics, pre-ED status, surgical data, and postoperative outcomes. Results Overall, 123 patients were diagnosed with acute appendicitis, 60 patients during P20 were compared to 63 patients in P19. The rate of complicated appendicitis cases was significantly higher during the COVID-19 Lockdown with 43.3% (26 patients) vs. 20.6% (13 patients), respectively (p < 0.01). The average delay in ED presentation between P20 and P19 was 3.4 vs. 2 days (p = 0.03). The length of stay was 2.6 days in P20 vs. 2.3 days in P19 (p = 0.4), and the readmission rate was 12% (7 patients) vs. 4.8% (3 patients), p = 0.17, respectively. Logistic regression demonstrated that a delay in ED presentation was a significant risk factor for complicated appendicitis (OR 1.139, CI 1.011-1.284). ConclusionThe effect of the COVID-19 initial outbreak and Lockdown coupled with hesitation to come to medical facilities appears to have discouraged patients with acute appendicitis from presenting to the ED as complaints began, causing a delay in diagnosis and treatment, which might have led to a higher rate of complicated appendicitis cases and a heavier burden on health care systems.