ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to elicit the views of relevant stakeholders on the design of a device using simulated affective touch to reduce procedural anxiety surrounding radiotherapy and imaging.DesignThis qualitative study collected data from focus groups which were then analysed using inductive thematic analysis in line with Braun and Clarke’s methods.Participants and settingTwenty patients and carers were recruited, as well as 10 healthcare practitioners involved in either delivering radiotherapy or imaging procedures.ResultsPatients, carers and healthcare practitioners agreed on some aspects of the device design, such as ensuring the device is warm and flexible in where it can be used on the body. However, patient and healthcare practitioner cohorts had at times differing viewpoints. For example, healthcare practitioners provided professional perspectives and required easy cleaning of the device. Meanwhile patients focused on anxiety-relieving factors, such as the tactile sensation of the device being either a vibration or pulsation. There was no consensus on who should control the device.ConclusionsThe desired features of a simulated affective touch device have been investigated. Different priorities of patients and their carers and healthcare practitioners were evident. Any design must incorporate such features as to appease both groups. Areas where no consensus was reached could be further explored, alongside including further patient and public involvement in the form of a project advisory group.

BackgroundAutistic adults and children experience considerable health inequalities and have high rates of premature mortality, hospital admissions and emergency department visits. This is in part due to a lack of autism awareness in the healthcare and social care workforce. A new educational programme, Time for Autism (TfA), for medical students is being developed to address this challenge. This qualitative study was undertaken to support the development of the new programme in order to (1) understand the medical care experiences of parents of autistic children and (2) assess their views on the acceptability of the new TfA programme and willingness to be involved.MethodsA convenience sample of 11 parents of autistic children were recruited across the South of England. The ages of the autistic children ranged from 3 to 17 years. Semistructured interviews were completed between October and December 2019. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsThree key themes were identified: diagnosis, experiences of doctors and TfA considerations. There was support for and willingness to take part in a dedicated autism education programme for medical students, and constructive feedback to inform and improve its delivery.ConclusionThe findings from this study provide insights into the medical care experiences of parents/carers of autistic children. Understanding how parents/carers of autistic children would like medical care to be improved can be used to develop TfA and other autism programmes. Parental/carer support for the development of and involvement in an autism medical education programme enhances the feasibility of the new programme.

Recently, a downward trend is seen in undergraduates wishing to pursue a career in cardiothoracic surgery(CTS). This is partly due to lack of clinical exposure and limited teaching during the undergraduate years; the focus being on cardiac ad vascular pathology. Aim Assess if WETLAB workshop encourages the engagement of medical students in CTS surgery Method We hosted a cardiac WETLAB workshop, led by a consultant cardiothoracic surgeon. Attendees were taught how to carry out an end-to-side anastomosis on animal tissue. We used pre-and -post exposure questionnaires composed of 10 items to assess the ability of the workshop to improve undergraduate interest in cardiothoracic surgery. The questionnaire included questions around students’ interest in the speciality, previous exposure to the speciality and whether students want to pursue a career in the speciality. Results Out of the 12 attendees, 10 completed both questionnaires. The workshop was well received with the overall satisfaction of 9.64 out of 10. It significantly increased respondents’ interest in CTS(z=-0.06, p = 0.01) but did not show any significant difference in encouraging them to pursue surgery. 100% of respondents agreed that specialised practical workshops should be incorporated within the medical school curriculum and that if the opportunity arises, they will attend another in the future. Conclusions Specialised practical workshops have the potential to play a significant role in the medical school curriculum in order to enhance exposure to the field of cardiothoracic surgery. This may lead to a positive impact on the number of doctors wishing to pursue this speciality in the future.