Introduction: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) combined with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were found to have a beneficial effect on patients with chronic kidney disease. Objective: The aim of our clinical trial was to compare the antialbuminuric effect of ramipril monotherapy, eplerenone monotherapy and eplerenone/ramipril combination therapy in patients with stage 1 hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: In a single-blind, randomized clinical trial, 75 hypertensive patients (stage 1 hypertension) with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria were randomized in a 1: 1: 1 ratio to 1 of 3 groups: ramipril 10 mg monotherapy (25 patients), eplerenone 50 mg monotherapy (25 patients) and combination therapy of eplerenone/ramipril 50/10 mg (25 patients) through a randomized clinical trial. Blood pressure, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum K level were measured before randomization and after 24 weeks. Results: Ramipril and eplerenone monotherapy showed a significant lowering of UACR compared with baseline levels (p ≤ 0.0001). The eplerenone/ramipril combination group showed a more significant reduction of UACR compared with the ramipril and eplerenone monotherapy groups (p = 0.0001). There was a more significant lowering of systolic blood pressure in the combination group (p < 0.0001). A nonsignificant change of serum potassium level, serum creatinine and eGFR was found among the 3 groups. Conclusion: Addition of eplerenone to ACEI shows an added antialbuminuric effect without significant change of the serum K level compared with eplerenone or ACEI.
Background
There is increasing evidence suggesting use of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA) in combination with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI) or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) to have a protective effect on chronic kidney disease patients.
Purpose
The aim of our study was to compare the antiproteinuric efficacy of ACEI monotherapy, Selective MRA monotherapy and their combination in mildly hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and microalbuminuria.
Methods
Seventy five patients with established diagnosis of type 2 DM, mild hypertension (systolic BP 140–159 mmHg and/or diastolic BP 90–99 mmHg) and microalbuminuria (30–299mg/g) were randomly assigned to one of three groups of therapy; ramipril 10 mg monotherapy (25 patients), eplerenone 50 mg monotherapy (25 patients) and eplerenone/ramipril 50/10 mg combination therapy (25 patients).The duration of the study was 24 weeks. All patients had measurement of blood pressure, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, renal function tests and serum K level at baseline and at the end of the study after 24 weeks. All patients were followed up monthly till the end of the study for detection of side effects and/or treatment failure.
Results
Both ramipril and eplerenone monotherapy significantly reduced microalbuminuria after 24 weeks nearly to the same extent (37% and 38% respectively) without significant difference between both groups (P=0.95). There was more significant reduction of microalbuminuria in the eplerenone/ramipril combination group (60%) compared with ramipril and eplerenone monotherapy groups (P=0.0001).All groups showed significant reduction of both systolic and diastolic BP with more significant reduction of systolic BP in combination group compared with monotherapy groups (P<0.0001).There was insignificant elevation of serum potassium level among the three groups with slightly higher non significant incidence of sustained hyperkalemia in combination group (P=0.5). All groups showed insignificant changes in serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Conclusion
Addition of eplerenone (selective MRA) to an ACE inhibitor may confer further antiproteinuric benefit with low risk of hyperkalemia compared with MRA or ACEI monotherapy.
Acknowledgement/Funding
None
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.