We aimed to clarify clinical implications of intrarenal hemodynamics assessed by intrarenal Doppler ultrasonography (IRD) and their prognostic impacts in heart failure (HF). We performed a prospective observational study, and examined IRD and measured interlobar renal artery velocity time integral (VTI) and intrarenal venous flow (IRVF) patterns (monophasic or non-monophasic pattern) to assess intrarenal hypoperfusion and congestion in HF patients (n = 341). Seven patients were excluded in VTI analysis due to unclear imaging. The patients were divided into groups based on (A) VTI: high VTI (VTI ≥ 14.0 cm, n = 231) or low VTI (VTI < 14.0 cm, n = 103); and (B) IRVF patterns: monophasic (n = 36) or non-monophasic (n = 305). We compared post-discharge cardiac event rate between the groups, and right-heart catheterization was performed in 166 patients. Cardiac index was lower in low VTI than in high VTI (P = 0.04), and right atrial pressure was higher in monophasic than in non-monophasic (P = 0.03). In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, cardiac event rate was higher in low VTI and monophasic groups (P < 0.01, respectively). In the Cox proportional hazard analysis, the combination of low VTI and a monophasic IRVF pattern was a predictor of cardiac events (P < 0.01). IRD imaging might be associated with cardiac output and right atrial pressure, and prognosis.
It has been recently recognized that recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), termed "recovered EF", occurs in a proportion of heart failure patients with reduced EF (HFrEF), and is associated with better prognosis. However, the clinical characteristics of "recovered EF" have not been fully examined. Consecutive 567 patients hospitalized due to HFrEF (EF < 40% at 1st assessment at hospital discharge) were enrolled, and EF was reassessed within half a year in an outpatient setting (2nd assessment). Among these HFrEF patients, 235 remained EF < 40% (reduced, rEF group), 82 changed to EF 40-49% (midrange, mrEF group), and 250 recovered to EF > 50% (preserved, pEF group "recovered EF") at the 2nd examination. Age was lower and body mass index and systolic blood pressure were higher in pEF than in rEF. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and usage of an implantable cardiac defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy were highest in pEF. Left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVDd) was the smallest in the pEF group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that younger age, presence of AF, and lower levels of LVDd were predictors of "recovered EF". Kaplan-Meier analysis found that pEF presented the lowest cardiac event rate (P = 0.003) and all-cause mortality (P = 0.001). In multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses, pEF (versus rEF) was an independent predictor of both cardiac event rate (HR = 0.668, 95%CI 0.450-0.994, P = 0.046) and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.655, 95%CI 0.459-0.934, P = 0.019). Hospitalized HFrEF patients with recovered EF are associated with younger age, higher presence of AF, and better prognosis.
Background: It has been reported that the pattern of hepatic vein (HV) waveforms determined by abdominal ultrasonography is useful for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. We aim to clarify the clinical implications of HV waveform patterns in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: We measured HV waveforms in 350 HF patients, who were then classified into 3 categories based on their waveforms: those with a continuous pattern (C group); those whose V wave ran under the R ESUM E
BackgroundIt has been recently reported that the renal venous stasis index (RVSI) assessed by renal Doppler ultrasonography provides information to stratify pulmonary hypertension that can lead to right-sided heart failure (HF). However, the clinical significance of RVSI in HF patients has not been sufficiently examined. We aimed to examine the associations of RVSI with parameters of cardiac function and right heart catheterization (RHC), as well as with prognosis, in patients with HF.MethodsWe performed renal Doppler ultrasonography, echocardiography and RHC in hospitalized patients with HF (n = 388). RVSI was calculated as follows: RVSI = (cardiac cycle time-venous flow time)/cardiac cycle time. The patients were classified to three groups based on RVSI: control group (RVSI = 0, n = 260, 67%), low RVSI group (0 < RVSI ≤ 0.21, n = 63, 16%) and high RVSI group (RVSI > 0.21, n = 65, 17%). We examined associations of RVSI with parameters of cardiac function and RHC, and followed up for cardiac events defined as cardiac death or worsening HF.ResultsThere were significant correlations of RVSI with mean right atrial pressure (mRAP; R = 0.253, P < 0.001), right atrial area (R = 0.327, P < 0.001) and inferior vena cava diameter (R = 0.327, P < 0.001), but not with cardiac index (R = −0.019, P = 0.769). During the follow-up period (median 412 days), cardiac events occurred in 60 patients. In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, the cumulative cardiac event rate increased with increasing RVSI (log-rank, P = 0.001). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, the cardiac event rate was independently associated with RVSI (high RVSI group vs. control group: hazard ratio, 1.908; 95% confidence interval, 1.046–3.479, P = 0.035).ConclusionRVSI assessed by renal Doppler ultrasonography reflects right-sided overload and is associated with adverse prognosis in HF patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.