Reactivation of Betaherpesvirinae (Human herpesvirus 6A: HHV-6A, -6B, HHV-7) may be associated with mental illness and host fatigue. This study aimed to determine whether viral reactivation, measured by monitoring salivary viral DNA load, can be used to monitor depression in pregnant and postpartum women. Saliva samples were collected from 64 pregnant women at five points of observation periods. The HHV-6-and HHV-7-specific qPCRs were carried out to measure viral DNA load. When HHV-6 DNA was detected in saliva, nested PCR was used to discriminate between HHV-6A and -6B. In both viruses, a significant correlation was observed between detection frequency and viral DNA load in saliva. In the lowshedding group, HHV-6 DNA was significantly higher in the third trimester (p < 0.0001), the time of delivery (p = 0.0003), 1 month after birth (p = 0.0023) compared with the first trimester, and HHV-7 was at the time of delivery (p = 0.0277) and 1 month after birth (p = 0.0235). Most of the detected HHV-6 DNAs in saliva were HHV-6B. Both viral DNA loads were significantly lower (HHV-6: p = 0.0101, HHV-7: p = 0.0044) in the subjects with abnormal Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores. The detection rate and viral DNA load of both viruses in saliva increased after the third trimester. Salivary virus DNA shedding was significantly lower in subjects with an abnormal EPDS score.

In the era of universal varicella vaccination, diagnosis of varicella is challenging, especially for breakthrough cases. We sought to clarify the reliability of direct varicella-zoster virus (VZV) loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and DermaQuick ® VZV using the immunochromatography technique as rapid diagnostic tests for varicella. In addition, the usefulness of saliva as a sample type for direct LAMP was investigated. Among the 46 enrolled patients with suspected VZV infection, 31 patients (67.3%) were positive for the nucleic acid test based on realtime PCR from skin swab samples. Direct LAMP of skin swabs was positive in 29 (63.0%) of 46 patients. DermaQuick ® VZV was positive in 25 (54.3%) of 46 patients.VZV DNA was detected in only 48.4% of oral swabs with the direct LAMP method.With real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the standard for diagnosing varicella, the sensitivity and specificity of DermaQuick ® VZV were 80.7% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of direct LAMP from skin swabs were 93.6% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of real-time PCR for DNA extracted from oral swabs were 74.2% and 93.3%, respectively. Thus, oral swab samples are not suitable for breakthrough varicella diagnosis. Although DermaQuick ® VZV is considered the most convenient point-of-care test for varicella, its sensitivity and specificity were lower than those of direct VZV LAMP.

Background In the era of universal varicella vaccination, diagnosis of varicella is challenging, especially for breakthrough cases. We sought to clarify the reliability of direct varicella-zoster virus (VZV) loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and DermaQuick® VZV using the immunochromatography technique as rapid diagnostic tests for varicella. In addition, the usefulness of saliva as a sample type for direct LAMP was also investigated. Methods Between April 2019 and January 2021, 46 patients suspected VZV infection were enrolled in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all participants. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Fujita Health University (No. 15–247). Samples were collected from skin eruptions using two different swabs. one swab which was soaked in 1 mL of isotonic saline was used for direct VZV LAMP and the other swab which was immersed in 500 µL of DermaQuick® VZV reaction buffer was used for DermaQuick® VZV. The isotonic saline solution used to wash the oral swab sample was used for direct VZV LAMP. The DNA extracted from the solutions were used for real-time PCR analysis. Results Thirty one patients (67.3%) were diagnosed with varicella based on real-time PCR of skin swabs. Direct LAMP of skin swabs was positive in 29 (63.0%) of 46 patients. DermaQuick® VZV was positive in 25 (54.3%) of 46 patients. The sensitivity for direct LAMP of skin swabs, DermaQuick® VZV, direct LAMP of oral swabs, and real-time PCR of oral swabs was 93.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.3–98.9%), 80.7% (95% CI, 63.7–90.8%), 48.3% (95% CI, 32.0–65.1%), and 74.2% (95% CI, 56.8–86.3%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of real-time PCR for DNA extracted from oral swabs was 74.2% (95% CI, 56.8–86.3%) and 93.3% (95% CI, 79.8–99.7%), respectively. Conclusion Although DermaQuick® VZV is the most convenient point-of-care test for varicella, the sensitivity and specificity of this method were slightly lower than those of direct VZV LAMP. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

RESULTS Demographic Characteristics of PatientsPaired serum samples collected from 32 patients with RVGE (18 males and 14 females) were analyzed in this study. Median age

No abstract