ABSTRACT:EB exposure characteristics, such as sensitivity and contrast, and durability against oxygen plasma were measured with linear copolymers and polymer blends of various composition, which were prepared from cx-methylstyrene [MSt] and methyl methacrylate [MMA]. Moreover, new developers were examined for these polymers, since sensitivity and contrast of the positive-working resist system depend largely on dissolution kinetics concerning each combination of the resist polymer and the developer. Methyl isobutyl ketone and isoamyl acetate were used as the developer, though they were developers of excessive dissolving power for PMMA and /or PMSt homopolymers. The copolymers containing 30-50mol% of MSt were as durable as PMSt homopolymer against oxygen plasma and had higher contrast than PMMA. The blend had dryetching durability as large as the copolymer of the same composition, and showed considerably high contrast, while the copolymer had higher sensitivity than the blend. The blends containing 21 mol% or Jess of MSt monomer units were much more durable than PMMA and of contrast as high as PMMA, but Jess sensitive than PMMA.KEY WORDS Sensitivity I Contrast I Durability I Oxygen Plasma I Dry Etching I cx-Methylstyrene I Methyl Methacrylate I Composition I Developer I As the dimensions of electronic devices shrink, the resists for microfabrication are required to have excellent performance such as i) higher contrast, ii) larger dry-etching durability, and iii) higher sensitivity. It is generally said from theoretical consideration and experimental results that positive-working resists are of high contrast. Recently, it has been found out that dry-etching durability and sensitivity are the two contradicting properties in positive-working electron resists; a durable resist such as poly(phenyl methacrylate)[PPhMA] has a low sensitivity, while a sensitive resist such as poly(butene-1 sulfone) [PBS] is not durable enough. 1 This tendency was derived from the study on one-component resist systems composed of degradable linear homopolymers, and does not deny the future development of excellent resist systems which have all the characteristics i), ii), and iii), if the candidates to be investigated are extended toward multi-component, crosslinked polymer, and /or copolymer systems. For example, PPhMA was sensitized by copolymerizing with a small amount of crosslinkable monomer at the slight expense of its large dry-etching durability. 2 The durability of poly( olefin sulfone) was extensively improved by blending with an aromatic resin at a great loss of high sensitivity, as was observed with the poly(2-methyl -1-pentene sulfone )-novo lac system. 3 Sensitivity of poly( methyl methacrylate) was enhanced by copolymerization with a fragile monomer, e.g., methyl chloroac-1091
SynopsisThe plasma etching durability of O2 and CCl, was investigated for copolymer and polymer blend of poly(methy1 methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(a-methylstyrene) (PMSt) as a function of MSt content. Further, the effects of crosslinking on plasma etching were studied by incorporating N-methylolated methacrylamide into the copolymer as a crosslinkable site during prebaking. The plasma-etching resistance of PMMA was largely improved by incorporating or adding only a small amount of MSt. Ekpecially in the case of the CC1, plasma etching, the copolymer and the polymer blend with 10 mol% of MSt showed etching resistance as great as that of PMSt homopolymer. Stabilization of the polymers against the plasma etching can be explained by the sponge effect, the energy migration followed by the quenching by the phenyl ring. The polymer blend offered similar etching resistance as the copolymer, indicating an effective occurrence of the energy migration between the polymer chains. Etching resistance was also improved by crosslinking, also due to the enhancement of the sponge effect.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.