In the catheter ablation for AF, we found no significant reduction in the 1-year incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias by ATP-guided PVI compared with conventional PVI.

Short-term use of AAD for 90 days following AF ablation reduced the incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias during the treatment period, but it did not lead to improved clinical outcomes at the later phase.

Backgrounds: Several studies have shown the serum high sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-TnI) a biomarker of myocardium injury, and C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of inflammation, are associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. We evaluated the relationship between the hs-TnI level in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Methods and Results:We enrolled 263 consecutive PAF patients who underwent PVI from May 2017 to April 2018. We investigated the difference in the relationship between the myocardial injury marker (serum hs-TnI), inflammatory marker (CRP, white blood cell) at 36 to 48 hours after the PVI, and early or late recurrence of AF (ERAF; <3 months and LRAF; from 3 months to 1 year) between the radiofrequency ablation group (R group) and cryoballoon ablation group (C group). The R group consisted of 147 patients and the C groups consisted of 116 patients. The serum hs-TnI level in R group was significantly lower than in the C group (2.33 vs 5.08 ng/mL; P < .001), while the CRP was significantly higher in the R group than C group (2.02 vs 1.10 mg/dL; P < .001). The incidences of an ERAF/LRAF were similar between the two groups.Conclusion: Cryoballoon ablation may cause more myocardial injury than radiofrequency catheter ablation, on the contrary, radiofrequency catheter ablation, may cause more inflammation than cryoballoon ablation. However, these phenomena may not affect the recurrence of AF after the PVI in patient with PAF. K E Y W O R D Shigh-sensitive cardiac troponin-T, inflammation, myocardial injury, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein isolation, recurrence of AF

Aims Previous studies could not demonstrate any benefit of more intensive ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) including complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) and linear ablation for recurrence in the initial catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to establish the non-inferiority of PVI alone to PVI plus these additional ablation strategies. Methods and results Patients with persistent AF who underwent an initial catheter ablation (n = 512, long-standing persistent AF; 128 cases) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either PVI alone (PVI-alone group) or PVI plus CFAE and/or linear ablation (PVI-plus group). After excluding 15 cases who did not receive procedures, we analysed 249 and 248 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, and/or atrial tachycardia, and the non-inferior margin was set at a hazard ratio of 1.43. In the PVI-plus group, 85.1% of patients had linear ablation and 15.3% CFAE ablation. After 12 months, freedom from the primary endpoint occurred in 71.3% of patients in the PVI-alone group and in 78.3% in the PVI-plus group [hazard ratio = 1.56 (95% confidence interval: 1.10–2.24), non-inferior P = 0.3062]. The procedure-related complication rates were 2.0% in the PVI-alone group and 3.6% in the PVI-plus group (P = 0.199). Conclusion This randomized trial did not establish the non-inferiority of PVI alone to PVI plus linear ablation or CFAE ablation in patients with persistent AF, but implied that the PVI plus strategy was promising to improve the clinical efficacy (NCT03514693).

The present study demonstrates increased ACE activity in culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome, indicating that enhanced ACE activity is related to the causative mechanism of active coronary lesions.