In our cohort, we found that endometrioid/endometrioid type synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancer had different clinical histopathologic characteristics and favorable prognosis compared to the other histologic types of these cancers. Histopathologic type of the ovarian cancer component, stage of endometrial cancer and level of cancer antigen 125 at diagnosis were observed to have a great influence on the development of recurrence and survival of synchronous primary carcinomas of the endometrium and ovary.

The complication rate of intraperitoneal access devices is comparatively low.

Background: In subtypes of non-endometrioid endometrium cancers (non-ECC), it is not clear whether the omentectomy is a part of debulking if visual assessment is normal. Recently, the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Endometrial Consensus Conference Working Group in their report titled “Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up” recommended that omentectomy be performed in the serous subtype, but not in carcinosarcoma, undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma or clear cell. In this study, the question is whether omentectomy should be a part of a staging procedure in patients with non-ECC. Besides, the sensitivity and specificity of the visual assessment of omentum were analyzed. Methods: Patients diagnosed with non-ECC in 2 gynecological oncology clinics between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Occult (absence of visible lesions) and gross (presence of visible lesions) omental metastasis rates of histological subtypes were analyzed. Results: We identified 218 patients with non-ECC. Thirty-four of them (15.1%) had omental metastases and 44.1% of these metastases (n = 15) were occult metastases. The sensitivity of the surgeon's visual assessment of an omentum (positive or negative) was 0.55. The highest rate of omental metastasis was found in carcinosarcoma followed by serous, mixed subtypes, and clear-cell (20.4, 17.3, 16.6, 10.0%, respectively). Adnexal metastasis was the only factor associated with occult omental metastasis (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Omental metastases occur too often to omit omentectomy during surgical procedures for non-ECC regardless of histological subtypes, and visual assessment is insufficient in recognizing the often occult metastases. Omentectomy should be a part of the staging surgery in patients with non-ECC.

Background and Objectives:In ovarian cancer, development of safe and effective methods for providing long-term access to the peritoneal cavity has become increasingly important. Methods: A modified Port-A-Cath (Celsite-port and catheters, B. Braun, Chasseneuil, France) was used in 56 patients with presumed epithelial ovarian cancer at the conclusion of primary or second-look laparotomy. In 37 patients, ports were located on the right costal margin in the midclavicular region and in 19 in the xiphoid region. Results: In 56 catheters, 8 (13.8%) complications of severe or moderate degree during the treatment were registered. In-flow obstruction of device occurred in 6 patients, and there was 1 viscous perforation and 1 catheter related infectious peritonitis. Grade III-IV pain and in-flow obstruction were developed in the patients with ports implanted on the right costal margin but not with ports implanted in the xiphoid region. Conclusion:The complication rate of intraperitoneal access devices is comparatively low.

The most common primary sites for ovarian metastasis are gastrointestinal tract. Metastasectomy may have beneficial effects on survival, especially if the residual disease is less than 5 mm. Prospective studies warranted to evaluate the value of metastasectomy in patients with ovarian metastasis.