PurposeThe present study aimed to determine the reliable imaging features to distinguish atypical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with peripheral rim-like enhancement from intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).MethodsA total of 168 patients (130 male, 57.10 ± 10.53 years) pathological confirmed HCC or IMCC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI between July 2019 and February 2022 were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine independent differential factors for distinguishing HCC from IMCC, and the model was established. Bootstrap resampling 1000 times was used to verify the model, which was visualized by nomograms. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.ResultsRadiological capsule (OR 0.024, 95% CI: 0.006, 0.095, P<0.001), heterogeneous signal intensity (SI) on T1WI (OR 0.009, 95%CI: 0.001,0.056, P<0.001) were independent differential factors for predicting HCC over IMCC. A lobulated contour (OR 11.732, 95%CI: 2.928,47.007, P = 0.001), target sign on DP (OR 14.269, 95%CI: 2.849,82.106, P = 0.007), bile duct dilatation (OR 12.856, 95%CI: 2.013, P = 0.001) were independent differential factors for predicting IMCCs over HCCs. The independent differential factors constituted a model to distinguish atypical HCCs and IMCCs. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity values of the model were 0.964(0.940,0.987), 0.88, and 0.906, indicating that the model had an excellent differential diagnostic performance. The decision curve analysis (DCA) curve showed that the model obtained a better net clinical benefit.ConclusionThe present study identified reliable imaging features for distinguishing atypical HCCs with peripheral rim-like enhancement from IMCCs on contrast-enhanced MRI. Our findings may help radiologists provide clinicians with more accurate preoperative imaging diagnoses to select appropriate treatment options.

Background The distinction between combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before the operation has an important clinical significance for optimizing the treatment plan and predicting the prognosis of patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely used in the preoperative diagnosis and evaluation of primary liver malignant tumors. Purpose The aim is to study the value of preoperative clinical data and enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of HCC and cHCC-CC and obtain independent risk factors for predicting cHCC-CC. Study type . Retrospective. Population. The clinical and imaging data of 157 HCC and 59 cHCC-CC patients confirmed by pathology were collected. Field Strength/Sequence . 1.5T; cross-sectional T1WI (gradient double echo sequence); cross-sectional T2WI (fast spin echo sequence, fat suppression); enhancement (3D LAVA technology). Assessment . The differences between the HCC and cHCC-CC patients were compared. Statistic Tests . Using the t -test, chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result 1. CHCC-CC was more likely to show multiple lesions than HCC (28.81% vs. 10.83%, P = 0.001) and more prone to microvascular invasion (MVI) (36.31% vs. 61.02%, P < 0.001). However, HCC had a higher incidence of liver cirrhosis than cHCC-CC (50.85% vs. 72.61%, P = 0.003). 2. The incidence of nonsmooth margin was higher in the cHCC-CC group (84.75% vs. 52.23%, P < 0.001). The incidence of peritumor enhancement in the arterial phase was higher in the cHCC-CC group (11.46% vs. 62.71%, P < 0.001) 3. According to the multivariate analysis, arterial peritumor enhancement (OR = 8.833,95%CI:4.033,19.346, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor for cHCC-CC ( P < 0.001)). It had high sensitivity (62.71%) and specificity (88.54%) in the diagnosis of cHCC-CC. Date Conclusions . Liver cirrhosis and the imaging findings of GD-DTPA-enhanced MRI are helpful for the differential diagnosis of HCC and cHCC-CC. In addition, the imaging sign of peritumoral enhancement in the arterial phase has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of cHCC-CC.

PurposeThe present study aimed to develop and validate a preoperative model based on gadobenate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) size of ≤5 cm. In order to provide preoperative guidance for clinicians to optimize treatment options.Methods164 patients with pathologically confirmed HCC and preoperative gadobenate-enhanced MRI from July 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression (forward LR) analyses were used to determine the predictors of MVI and the model was established. Four-fold cross validation was used to verify the model, which was visualized by nomograms. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.ResultsElevated alpha-fetoprotein (HR 1.849, 95% CI: 1.193, 2.867, P=0.006), atypical enhancement pattern (HR 3.441, 95% CI: 1.523, 7.772, P=0.003), peritumoral hypointensity on HBP (HR 7.822, 95% CI: 3.317, 18.445, P&lt;0.001), and HBP hypointensity (HR 3.258, 95% CI: 1.381, 7.687, P=0.007) were independent risk factors to MVI and constituted the HBP model. The mean area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values for the HBP model were as follows: 0.830 (95% CI: 0.784, 0.876), 0.71, 0.78, 0.81 in training set; 0.826 (95% CI:0.765, 0.887), 0.8, 0.7, 0.79 in test set. The decision curve analysis (DCA) curve showed that the HBP model achieved great clinical benefits.ConclusionIn conclusion, the HBP imaging features of Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI play an important role in predicting MVI for HCC. A preoperative model, mainly based on HBP imaging features of gadobenate-enhanced MRI, was able to excellently predict the MVI for HCC size of ≤5cm. The model may help clinicians preoperatively assess the risk of MVI in HCC patients so as to guide clinicians to optimize treatment options.

Background Combined hepatocellular-cholangicarcinoma ( cHCC-CC) is a rare primary liver malignant tumor, the distinction between cHCC-CC and HCC before operation has important clinical significance for optimizing the treatment plan and predicting the prognosis of patients. This study intends to study the value of preoperative clinical date and enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of HCC and cHCC-CC and to obtain independent risk factors for predicting cHCC-CC. Methods The clinical and imaging data of 157 HCC and 59 cHCC-CC patients confirmed by pathology were collected, and the differences between the two groups of patients were compared by t test, chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis.Results CHCC-CC was more likely to show multiple lesions than HCC (28.81% Vs 10.83%，P=0.001) and more prone to microvascular invasion (MVI) (36.31%Vs 61.02%，P＜0.001). However, HCC had a higher incidence of liver cirrhosis than cHCC-CC (50.85% Vs72.61% ，P=0.003). The incidence of non-smooth margin was higher in cHCC-CC group (84.75% Vs52.23%，P＜0.001). The incidence of peritumor enhancement in arterial phase was higher in cHCC-CC group (11.46%Vs 62.71%，P＜0.001) Multivariate analysis showed that liver cirrhosis and arterial peritumor enhancement were independent risk factors for predicting cHCC-CC. In addition, the imaging sign of arterial phase peritumor enhancement had high sensitivity (62.71%) and specificity (88.54%) in the diagnosis of cHCC-CC.Conclusions Liver cirrhosis and the imaging findings of GD-DTPA-enhanced MRI are helpful for the differential diagnosis of HCC and cHCC-CC. In addition, the imaging sign of peritumoral enhancement in the arterial phase has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of cHCC-CC.