Background: This study compared the practice of elderly hip fractures management at Jordan University Hospital against the practice recommended by American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Methods: Medical records between Oct 1, 2017, and Oct 31, 2018, were reviewed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria included patients over the age of 65 yr who were admitted from the emergency department. Patients excluded from the study were involved in motor vehicle accidents, had pathological fractures, or were transferred from other hospitals. One hundred and thirteen patients were included. Results: All patients received venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and none had preoperative traction. Surgery was done within 48 hr in 83% (94/113) of patients. All patients with unstable femoral neck fractures underwent arthroplasty. Sliding hip screws were used in 93.5% (29/31) of stable intertrochanteric fractures, but cephalomedullary devices were used in 86.7% of unstable fractures (46 patients). Rehabilitation was done for a majority of patients. Unfortunately, preoperative regional analgesia was not used at all. Bipolar heads were used in a majority of hemiarthroplasty cases. A blood transfusion threshold of no higher than 8 g/dL was only followed in 16 cases. Only 23.9% of patients continued physical therapy at home. Fewer than one-third of the patients underwent nutritional assessment or support. Only 15 patients received a secondary mode of analgesia postoperatively. Vitamin D and calcium were prescribed for less than 50% of patients. Only 10.6% were evaluated for osteoporosis after fracture. Conclusions: Compliance with AAOS guidelines is reasonable, and it can be increased by following recommendations regarding: preoperative analgesia, femoral head type, blood transfusion threshold, home physical therapy, nutritional assessment, pain management, vitamin D and calcium supplementation, and osteoporosis treatment. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Case: A 25-year-old man presented with progressive pain and swelling of the left foot for 4 years. The images showed a contrast-enhanced mixed lesion (osteolytic and blastic) of the first metatarsal bone with surrounding soft-tissue edema. The differential diagnoses favored chronic osteomyelitis or neoplasia, most likely benign. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of osteoblastoma as immature bone trabeculae rimmed by osteoblasts appeared. Then, the patient was successfully treated with wide surgical excision of the first metatarsal bone and reconstruction using a nonvascularized fibular autograft. After 3 years of follow-up, the graft was well incorporated and no recurrence was encountered. Conclusion: Osteoblastoma is rare in metatarsals; only 12 cases have been reported. It may have similar clinical and radiological picture to osteomyelitis. Wide surgical excision followed by fibular autograft reconstruction is an effective treatment option.

Introduction: Myositis ossificans (MO) is a benign non-neoplastic condition in which heterotopic bone formation occurs in soft tissues. Neurogenic MO is one variant of MO where the lesion is a result of neurological disorders, including brain and spinal cord injuries, especially when followed by immobility and spasticity. MO can also be a result of direct trauma or even genetic mutations. Case Report: We present three cases of young men (16, 37, and 22-year-old) who developed MO of the hip joint following brain or spinal cord injuries. One of them had also sustained a direct trauma to the affected hip joint at the time of the accident. All three patients presented with inability to walk independently due to diminished range of motion at the affected joint. X-rays and computerized tomography (CT) scans with 3-dimentional (3D) reconstruction suggested the diagnosis of MO, but the serum alkaline phosphatase was within normal limits at the time of presentation. The first case had bilateral involvement with unmistakable separation between the heterotopic bone formation and the frank hip joints on CT. This patient underwent successful staged excision of the ossifications. The second patient had unilateral hip joint involvement with the absence of clear separation between the heterotopic bone formation and the hip joint, thus, underwent total hip replacement for the affected side as excision was not possible. The third patienthad unilateral hip joint involvement and underwent excision of the ossification with dynamic hip screw insertion after sustaining a stable intertrochanteric fracture intraoperatively. Postoperatively, all three patients received physiotherapy and oral indomethacin. Upon recovery, they were able to walk independently with a near-normal range of motion at the hip joint. There was no evidence of recurrence upon follow-up visits, and CT scans in patients I and II. Follow-ups for patient III were not possible as the patient died 1 month after surgery due t

Introduction: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare complication of total knee replacement (TKR), yet it is a serious and debilitating condition. Bacterial infection accounts for the majority of cases and fungal infection is estimated to cause 1% of all prosthesis infection. Case Report: This case presents a 60years female, who presented to our outpatient orthopedic clinic complaining of right knee pain, swelling, and hotness. The physical examination revealed redness, hotness, restricted range of movement, and tibial loosening, 9 months following TKR revision. Culture of the joint aspirate showed growth of “Candida parapsilosis” and second aspirate confirmed the diagnosis. The patient then underwent two stages revision surgery with placement of amphotericin B loaded cement, to maintain high local antifungal concentration in addition to decrease the side effects of amphotericinB infusion such as thrombophlebitis and the more serious systemic effect as nephrotoxicity. The post-operative course was uneventful, with gradual improvement and restoration of normal movement range. Conclusion: Fungal PJI is a rare complication of TKR, yet it results in severe debilitating symptoms and impairment of the patient functional capacity. Careful evaluation of the patient followed by a detailed workup is necessary for the identification of the underlying causative micro-organism. Two-stage revision surgery with antifungal loaded cement spacer and antifungal therapy currently is the standard of management. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fungal PJI following total knee arthroplasty reported in Jordan. Keywords: Fungal prosthetic joint infection, fungal infection, total knee replacement, total knee replacement complication.

No abstract