A number of experimenters observed that the blast shockwave loads experienced by circular cross sections were lower than the predicted loads. These observations revealed a gap in the understanding of the interaction between blasts and structures. The question of quantifying these reduced loads for purposes of analysis and design presented itself for investigation. This paper presents the numerical investigation of the blast reflection reduction due to diffraction around a circular cross section using the commercial software ANSYS Autodyn. The investigation focused on the effects of the cross section's diameter and the explosion's scaled distance on the reflected blast pressure and impulse. Nine numerical gauge points recorded pressure-time and impulse-time histories at regular radial intervals around the front quarter of the circular section. The model's results agreed with incident and reflected pressure and impulse design values. The results indicated that as the diameter of the section increased the peak reflected pressure and impulse at the point of incidence rapidly approached the design values. The results also indicated that both the pressure and the impulse varied sinusoidally between a maximum at the point of incidence and a minimum, approximately equal to the incident pressure and impulse, at the side of the section. Using a sinusoidal curve fit to obtain equivalent reflected pressure and impulse values showed that the actual pressure and impulse acting on a circular cross section were approximately half the recommended design values. The results supported the obvious advantages of designing circular members to resist blast loading. Simplified equations are proposed for calculating the equivalent pressure and impulse acting on circular sections from the standard design values.
For a structure subjected to it, a blast shockwave may be the severest load it will experience in its service life. A structure inadequately designed against blast may experience extensive damage and, in extreme cases, may collapse completely. Ensuring an adequate design depends on the accurate prediction of the blast shockwave and the loads it will impart on the structure. Blast shockwaves, however, are notoriously difficult to predict. The difficulties arise in part due to the reflected pressure and impulse developed by a blast shockwave depending on the obstacle's response and geometry. Clearing is a result of the blast shockwave propagating around the edge of an obstacle, thus reducing the pressure build up from what would develop on an infinite surface. Thus, a clearer understanding of this phenomenon, and a simple practical method for predicting it, would improve blast load predictions and aid in blast resistant design. There are several experimental studies reported in the literature investigating this phenomenon. The studies, however, are limited to small scale blasts, and the prediction tools they propose are complicated to use. This article extends the range of available results numerically using ANSYS Autodyn, and proposes a tool to aid the blast resistant design engineer in more accurately quantifying the cleared blast loads imparted on a structure or structural element. Thus, after validating that Autodyn was suitable for investigating clearing problems, a series of two-dimensional models were built to investigate the parameters affecting clearing. The parameters investigated were the range, blast scaled distance, and distance to the edge of the target. The results of the numerical study resulted in a design aid for determining the cleared blast shockwave pressure on a finite target a given distance from the edge. The design aid proposed in this article is simple and applicable over a wide range of scaled distances.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.