No abstract

Mercury an important therapeutic substance in Tibetan Medicine undergoes complex ''detoxification'' prior to inclusion in multiingredient formulas. In an initial cross-sectional study, patients taking Tibetan Medicine for various conditions were evaluated for mercury toxicity. Two groups were identified: Group 1, patients taking ''Tsothel'' the most important detoxified mercury preparation and Group 2, patients taking other mercury preparations or mercury free Tibetan Medicine. Atomic fluorescence spectrometry of Tibetan Medicine showed mercury consumption 130 mg/kg/day (Group 1) and 30 mg/kg/day (Group 2) (P 0.001), levels above EPA (RfDs) suggested threshold (0.3 mg/kg /day) for oral chronic exposure. Mean duration of Tibetan Medicine treatment was 9 AE 17 months (range 3-116) (Group 1) and 5 AE 1.96 months (range 1-114) (Group 2) (NS) with cumulative days of mercury containing Tibetan Medicine, 764 days AE 1214 (range 135-7330) vs. 103 days AE 111 (range 0-426), respectively (P 0.001). Comparison of treatment groups with healthy referents (Group 3) not taking Tibetan Medicine showed no significant differences in prevalence of 23 non-specific symptoms of mercury toxicity, abnormal neurological, cardiovascular and dental findings and no correlation with mercury exposure variables; consumption, cumulative treatment days, blood/ urine Hg. Liver and renal function tests in treatment groups were not significantly increased compared to referents, with mean urine Beta 2 Microglobulin within the normal range and not significantly associated with Hg exposure variables after correcting for confounding variables. Neurocognitive testing showed no significant intergroup differences for Wechsler Memory Scale, Grooved Pegboard, Visual Retention, but Group1 scores were better for Mini-Mental, Brief Word Learning, Verbal Fluency after correcting for confounding variables. These results suggest mercury containing Tibetan Medicine does not have appreciable adverse effects and may exert a possible beneficial effect on neurocognitive function. Since evidence of mercury as a toxic heavy metal, however, is well known, further analysis of literature on mercury use in other Asian traditional systems is highly suggested prior to further studies.

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The objective of this study was to present our clinical experience of using the thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A prospective clinical study performed after the IRB approval (Sechenov University, Russia). Patients with stones &#x3c;30 mm were treated with SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) (NTO IRE-Polus, Russia) through a 200-μm-diameter fiber. Stone size, density, the duration of the operation, and laser on time (LOT) were measured. Based on the surgeon’s feedback, retropulsion and intraoperative visibility were also assessed (Likert scale). Stone-free rates (SFRs) were assessed with a low-dose CT scan 90 days after the operation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Between January 2018 and December 2019, 153 patients (mean age 54 ± 2.8 years) underwent RIRS with SP TFL (mean stone density 1,020 ± 382 HU). Median stone volume was 279.6 (139.4–615.8) mm³. Median LOT was 2.8 (IQR 1.6–6.6) min with median total energy for stone ablation 4.0 (IQR 2.1–7.17) kJ, median ablation speed was 1.7 (1.0–2.8) mm³/s, median ablation efficacy was 13.3 (7.3–20.9) J/mm³, and energy consumption was 170.3 (59.7–743.3) J/s. Overall, the SFR (at 3 months) was 89%. The overall complication rate was 8.4%. Retropulsion was present in 23 (15.1%) patients. Visibility was estimated as optimal in most patients, with poor visibility reported in only 13 (8.5%) patients. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The SP TFL is a safe and efficient tool in lithotripsy, irrespective of the stone type and density. Retropulsion is minimal and visibility is maintained with SP TFL. Nonetheless, further clinical studies are needed to ensure optimal comparison with conventional holmium:YAG lithotripsy.