There is no consensus that hyperglycaemia is an independent predictor of morbidity-mortality in children. This retrospective observational study aimed to assess the association between abnormal perioperative glucose levels and adverse outcomes in infants receiving open-heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The records of a total of 233 infants who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass for a variety of congenital cardiac procedures between January and December 2010 were reviewed. The blood glucose levels, demographic and perioperative information were recorded. Patients who experienced complications (n=91) were compared with those who did not (n=142). We found both intraoperative and postoperative glucose levels increased compared to the preoperative values (P <0.001). Thirty patients (12.8%) experienced hyperglycaemia and 15 patients (6.4%) experienced at least one episode of hypoglycaemia during surgery. Within the first two days after surgery, 12 (5.2%) patients experienced hyperglycaemia and 32 (13.7%) became hypoglycaemic in the paediatric intensive care unit. However, the abnormal perioperative glucose levels were not associated with increased adverse outcomes. After adjusting for other potential variables, lower weight at surgery, longer surgery time and hospital length-of-stay are the independent predictors of morbidity-mortality. Our findings suggest that perioperative hyperglycaemia and mild transient hypoglycaemia do not appear to be detrimental to infants with congenital heart disease, although we did not assess neurological outcomes. Nevertheless, due to the limitations of the retrospective design of this study and its limited power, more thorough clinical randomised controlled trials are needed.
Introduction: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) has been widely used for volume expansion, but its safety as priming fluid for cardiopulmonary bypass has been questioned recently. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety of albumin and hydroxyethyl starch as priming fluid for cardiopulmonary bypass.Methods: Pubmed, Embase database and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients who received HES or albumin as priming fluid for cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery published up to October 2019. Two reviewers independently extracted the valid data, including the length of ICU stay, ventilator time, the length of hospital stay, crystal volume, fresh frozen plasma, platelet input, blood loss, blood platelet count. hemoglobin value, fibrin, APTT, PT, urea, creatinine and urine volume. Meta-analysis was performed with revman version 5.3. Results: Total 9 RCTs involving 452 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with albumin, HES had similar effects on the length of ICU stay(MD = 0.70;95%CI:-0.14 to 1.55;P = 0.10;I2 = 89%);ventilation time(MD = 2.31 ;95%CI-3.93 to 8.55;P = 0.47,I2 = 60%); the length of hospital stay(MD = -0.31;95% CI:-2.00 to 1.37; P = 0.71 ;I2 = 0%); crystal volume(SMD = 0.26;95% CI:-0.09 to 0.61; P = 0.15;I2 = 0%); fresh frozen plasma(SMD = 0.25;95%CI:-0.08 to 0.59;P = 0.66;I2 =0%); platelet input(SMD =-0.17;95% Cl:-0.59 to 0.26;P =0.45;I2 = 0%);blood loss (SMD =0.31;95% Cl:-0.01 to 0.63;P = 0.06;I2 =29%);platelet count (SMD =-0.21;95% cl :-0.54 to 0.11; P = 0.20;I2 = 29% );hemoglobin value(SMD =0.1;95% CI: -0.15 to 0.36;P = 0.42; I2 = 0% ); fibrin (SMD =0.12;95% CI: -0.19 to 0.44 ; P = 0.45; I2 = 0% );APTT(MD =1.13;95% CI: -2.06 to 4.32 ; P = 0.49; I2 = 0%);PT(MD =0.10;95% CI: -0.21 to 0.40,P = 0.52; I2 = 0%);creatinine(SMD =0.09;95% CI: -0.32 to 0.50 ; P = 0.66; I2 = 51% );urine volume(SMD =0.11;95% CI: -0.26 to 0.48 ; P = 0.55; I2 = 43% ).but did not increase urea (SMD =-0.46;95% CI: -0.81 to -0.11; P = 0.01; I2 = 0%).Conclusions: HES was safe and effective compared to albumin as priming fluid for cardiopulmonary bypass because it did not affect renal function, coagulation function, liquid input, or the length of ICU stay and ventilation time of patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.