Even a tiny functioning pituitary adenoma could cause symptoms; hence, accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial for management. However, it is difficult to diagnose a small pituitary adenoma using conventional MR sequence. Deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high-resolution thin-section imaging with noise reduction. In the present single-institution retrospective study of 201 patients, conducted between August 2019 and October 2020, we compared the performance of 1 mm DLR MRI with that of 3 mm routine MRI, using a combined imaging protocol to detect and delineate pituitary adenoma. Four readers assessed the adenomas in a pairwise fashion, and diagnostic performance and image preferences were compared between inexperienced and experienced readers. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was quantitatively assessed. New detection of adenoma, achieved using 1 mm DLR MRI, was not visualised using 3 mm routine MRI (overall: 6.5% [13/201]). There was no significant difference depending on the experience of the readers in new detections. Readers preferred 1 mm DLR MRI over 3 mm routine MRI (overall superiority 56%) to delineate normal pituitary stalk and gland, with inexperienced readers more preferred 1 mm DLR MRI than experienced readers. The SNR of 1 mm DLR MRI was 1.25-fold higher than that of the 3 mm routine MRI. In conclusion, the 1 mm DLR MRI achieved higher sensitivity in the detection of pituitary adenoma and provided better delineation of normal pituitary gland than 3 mm routine MRI.
Objectives To determine reproducible MRI parameters predictive of molecular subtype and risk stratification in glioma and develop a structured reporting system. Methods All study patients were initially diagnosed with glioma, 141 from the Cancer Genome Atlas and 131 from our tertiary institution, as training and validation sets, respectively. Images were analyzed by three neuroradiologists with 1-7 years of experience. MRI features including contrast enhancement pattern, necrosis, margin, edema, T2/FLAIR mismatch, internal cyst, and cerebral blood volume higher than normal cortex were reported using a structured reporting system. The pathology was stratified into five risk types: (1) oligodendroglioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase [IDH]-mutant, 1p19q co-deleted; (2) diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade II-III; (3) glioblastoma, IDH-mutant, grade IV; (4) diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-wild, grade II-III; and (5) glioblastoma, IDH-wild, grade IV. Significant predictors were selected using multivariate logistic regression, and diagnostic performance was tested using a validation set. Results Reproducible imaging parameters exhibiting > 50% agreement across readers included the presence of necrosis, T2/ FLAIR mismatch, internal cyst, and predominant contrast enhancement. In the validation set, prediction of risk type 5 exhibited the highest diagnostic performance with AUCs of 0.92 (reader 1) and 0.93 (reader 2) with predominant enhancement, followed by risk type 2 with AUCs of 0.95 and 0.95 with T2/FLAIR mismatch sign and no necrosis, and risk type 1 with AUCs of 0.84 and 0.83 with internal cyst or necrosis. Risk types 3 and 4 were difficult to visually predict. Conclusions Imaging parameters with high reproducibility enabling prediction of IDH-wild-type glioblastoma, IDH-mutant/ 1p19q co-deletion oligodendroglioma, and IDH-mutant diffuse astrocytoma were identified. Key Points• Reproducible MRI parameters for determining molecular subtypes of glioma included the presence of necrosis, T2/FLAIR mismatch, internal cyst, and predominant contrast enhancement. • IDH-wild type glioblastoma, IDH-mutant/1p19q co-deletion oligodendroglioma, and IDH-mutant low-grade astrocytoma were identified using MRI parameters with high inter-reader reproducibility. • Identification of IDH-wild type low-grade glioma and IDH-mutant glioblastoma was difficult by visual analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.