Somaclonal variation induced in vitro during tissue culture can be a problem in clonal micropropagation of elite plants. This study investigated the extent of morphological and genetic similarity or dissimilarity between Melia volkensii in vitro plants (somatic seedlings) obtained via somatic embryogenesis and normal seedlings. Comparisons were made between in vitro plants regenerated directly from cotyledon explants, indirectly from zygotic embryos and normal seedlings of the same parent trees. Regeneration was achieved using half MS medium supplemented with 0.05 mg/l thidiazuron. Shoots were elongated in half MS with 0.1 mg/l BAP plus 0.01 mg/l IAA then rooted in half MS with 0.1 mg/l IBA and 0.1 mg/l NAA. Six morphometric and five meristic characters were used for the morphological characterization. PCR-RAPD markers were used for assessment of genetic similarity or distance. Multivariate analysis using principal coordinates, cluster analysis, analysis of similarities (Anosim) and similarity percentages analysis (SIMPER) revealed significant dissimilarities (p< 0.0001) in morphometric and meristic characters between the in vitro plants and normal seedlings. However, significant similarity (p<0.01) was observed in the RAPD-genic characters of the in vitro plants and normal seedlings. Out of six morphometric traits, taproot length, internode length and shoot height were the most important sources of dissimilarity, cumulatively accounting for 72.37% of overall morphometric dissimilarity. Number of lateral roots was the single most important source of meristic dissimilarity, with 77.02% contribution. Plants regenerated directly from cotyledons were more similar to the normal seedlings in morphological and RAPD-marker characters than those regenerated indirectly from zygotic embryos. This study paves the way for identification of trait-specific RAPD markers for further characterization through sequence-characterized amplified regions (SCARs).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.