Kidney volume is associated with renal function and the severity of renal diseases, thus accurate assessment of the kidney is important. Although the voxel count method is reported to be more accurate than several methods, its laborious and time-consuming process is considered as a main limitation. In need of a new technology that is fast and as accurate as the manual voxel count method, the aim of this study was to develop the first deep learning model for automatic kidney detection and volume estimation from computed tomography (CT) images of dogs. A total of 182,974 image slices from 386 CT scans of 211 dogs were used to develop this deep learning model. Owing to the variance of kidney size and location in dogs compared to humans, several processing methods and an architecture based on UNEt Transformers which is known to show promising results for various medical image segmentation tasks including this study. Combined loss function and data augmentation were applied to elevate the performance of the model. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) which shows the similarity between manual segmentation and automated segmentation by deep-learning model was 0.915 ± 0.054 (mean ± SD) with post-processing. Kidney volume agreement analysis assessing the similarity between the kidney volume estimated by manual voxel count method and the deep-learning model was r = 0.960 (p < 0.001), 0.95 from Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and 0.975 from the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Kidney volume was positively correlated with body weight (BW), and insignificantly correlated with body conditions score (BCS), age, and sex. The correlations between BW, BCS, and kidney volume were as follows: kidney volume = 3.701 × BW + 11.962 (R2 = 0.74, p < 0.001) and kidney volume = 19.823 × BW/BCS index + 10.705 (R2 = 0.72, p < 0.001). The deep learning model developed in this study is useful for the automatic estimation of kidney volume. Furthermore, a reference range established in this study for CT-based normal kidney volume considering BW and BCS can be helpful in assessment of kidney in dogs.
A 7-year-old castrated male Pomeranian dog weighing 5 kg presented with a right-sided continuous murmur without any clinical signs. Thoracic radiographs indicated cardiomegaly and right atrial (RA) bulging. Echocardiography revealed a tunnel originating from the right coronary sinus of Valsalva and terminating in the RA. Contrast echocardiography revealed pulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a tortuous shunting vessel that originated from the aorta extending in a ventral direction, ran along the right ventricular wall, and was inserted into the RA. Based on these diagnostic findings, the dog was diagnosed with the aorta-RA tunnel. At the 1-year follow-up visit without treatment, the dog showed no significant change except for mild left ventricular volume overload and mildly decreased contractility. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of an aorta-RA tunnel that has been described in detail using echocardiography and CT in a dog. In conclusion, the aorta-RA tunnel should be included in the clinical differential diagnoses if a right-sided continuous murmur is heard or shunt flow originating from the aortic root is identified.
IntroductionUrethral thickness measurements can be indicative of the pathological state of a patient; however to the best of our knowledge, no measurement reference range has been established in small-breed dogs. This study aimed to establish reference ranges for total urethral thickness and urethral wall thickness in healthy small-breed dogs; “urethral wall thickness” was assumed to be 1/2 of the “total urethral thickness.”MethodsTotal urethral thickness was measured by ultrasonography in 240 healthy small-breed dogs. In both female and male dogs, the thickness was measured in the mid-sagittal plane. In female dogs, it was measured immediately before the pelvic bone. In male dogs, it was measured caudal to the prostate and cranial to the pelvic bone. The total urethral thickness we measured is the total thickness of the collapsed urethra, which is the sum of the thicknesses of the dorsal and ventral urethral wall.ResultsThe mean value of total urethral thickness was 3.15 ± 0.83 mm (urethral wall thickness, 1.58 ± 0.41 mm) in 240 small-breed dogs. The total urethral thickness was significantly greater in male dogs than in female dogs (p < 0.001), even when compared among the same breeds (p < 0.05). The mean value of the total urethral thickness in females was 2.78 ± 0.60 mm (urethral wall thickness, 1.39 ± 0.30 mm), and 3.53 ± 0.86 mm (urethral wall thickness, 1.76 ± 0.43 mm) in males. There was very weak positive correlation between body weight (BW) and total urethral thickness (R2 = 0.109; β = 0.330; p < 0.001). Intraobserver reliability measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.986 (p < 0.001) and interobserver reliability measured by ICC was 0.966 (p < 0.001).DiscussionThis study described the differences in total urethral thickness between breeds, sexes, and sterilization status, and the correlation between BW and total urethral thickness. Furthermore, this is the first study to provide reference ranges of total urethral thickness and urethral wall thickness in small-breed dogs using ultrasonography, and is expected to be useful for urethral evaluation in veterinary diagnostic imaging.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.