Study DesignProspective randomized noninferiority trial.PurposeTo evaluate whether the union rate of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is inferior to that of a mixture of β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and HA.Overview of LiteratureThere have been no clinical trials investigating the outcomes of a mixture of HA and DBM in a PEEK cage in ACDF.MethodsEighty-five eligible patients were randomly assigned to group B (n=43), in which a PEEK cage with a mixture of HA and DBM was used, or group C (n=42), in which a PEEK cage with a mixture of HA and β-TCP was used. The primary study endpoint was the fusion rate, which was assessed with dynamic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. Secondary endpoints included pain intensity using a visual analogue scale, functional outcome using a neck disability index score, laboratory tests of inflammatory profiles, and the infection rate.ResultsSeventy-seven patients (38 in group B and 39 in group C) were included in the final analysis. One year postoperatively, bone fusion was achieved in 87% of group B patients and 87% of group C patients on dynamic radiographs, and 87% of group B patients and 72% of group C patients on CT scans (p=1.00 and 0.16, respectively). There were also no between-groups differences with respect to the secondary endpoints.ConclusionsA HA/DBM mixture inside a PEEK cage can provide noninferior outcomes compared to a HA/TCP mixture in ACDF.

Study DesignRetrospective study.PurposeTo compare the union rate of posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) using demineralized bone matrix (DBM) versus hydroxyapatite (HA) as bone graft extender.Overview of LiteratureTo our knowledge, there has been no clinical trial to compare the outcomes of DBM versus HA as a graft material for PLF.MethodsWe analyzed prospectively collected data from consecutive 79 patients who underwent instrumented PLF. Patients who received DBM were assigned to group B (n=38), and patients who received HA were assigned into group C (n=41). The primary study outcome was fusion rate assessed with radiographs. The secondary outcomes included pain intensity using a visual analogue scale, functional outcome using Oswestry disability index score, laboratory tests of inflammatory profiles and infection rate.ResultsOne year postoperatively, bone fusion was achieved in 73% in group B and 58% in group C without significant difference between the groups (p=0.15). There were no differences between the groups with respect to secondary outcomes.ConclusionsDBM would provide noninferior outcomes compared to the HA as a fusion material for PLF, and could be a notable alternative.

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the outcomes of modular neck-utilization in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).Materials and MethodsThirty patients (34 hips) who had modular stem THA between April 2011 and January 2013 were evaluated. There were 19 men and 11 women with a mean age of 61.2 years at the time of surgery. There were 20 cases of osteonecrosis of femoral head, 7 cases of osteoarthritis, 6 cases of femur neck fracture, and 1 case of rheumatoid arthritis. No patients presented with anatomical deformity of hip. Patients were operated on using a modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach. All patients underwent clinical and radiological follow-up at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months, and every year postoperatively. The mean duration of follow-up was 48.2 months (range, 39 to 59 months).ResultsThe average Harris hip score improved from 63.7 to 88.1 at the final follow-up. Radiographically, mean acetabular cup inclination was 45.3°(range, 36°-61°) and anteversion was 21.7°(range, 11°-29°). All were neutral-positioned stems except 5 which were varus-positioned stems. In only 3 cases (8.8%), varus or valgus necks were required. A case of linear femoral fracture occurred intraoperatively and 1 case of dislocation occurred at postoperative 2 weeks. No complications at modular junction were occurred.ConclusionOur study shows that the use of modular necks had favorable clinical and radiographic results. This suggests that the use of modular neck in primary THA without anatomical deformity is safe at a follow-up of 39 months.

PurposeTo investigate the clinical and radiologic outcomes following treatment of intertrochanteric fractures using the Compression Hip Nail® (CHN), which has a sliding lag screw.Materials and MethodsTwenty-eight cases of intertrochanteric fractures treated with CHN from November 2012 to October 2013 and followed-up for >6 months were included. The patient population consisted of 11 men and 17 women with a mean age of 75.2 years at the time of surgery. For the initial 11 cases, 10 mm sliding lag screws were used; the remaining 17 cases used 20 mm sliding lag screws. Clinical variables including operation time, amount of transfusion, weight-bearing start time, postoperative physical activity, and complications were investigated. The average sliding of lag screws and the average union were investigated radiologically at 3 and 6 months after surgery.ResultsIn an analysis of 23 cases (exclusion of 3 cases of lag screw cutout and 2 cases of nonunion), 11 (48%) recovered their pre-injury activity level. In an analysis of 25 cases (exclusion of 3 cases of cutout), 17 (68%) and 23 (92%) showed radiological union at postoperative months 3 and 6, respectively. Seven complications were noted. Cutout of the lag screw and the lateral protrusion of barrels were significantly greater in the group with 10 mm sliding lag screws as compared to the group using 20 mm sliding lag screws.ConclusionThe use of CHN for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture yielded poor results. However, results from patients in the 20 mm sliding lag screw group were better than for the 10 mm sliding lag screw group. Therefore, use of the 20 mm sliding lag screw is advisable.

Study Design: A case report. Objectives: We report a case of posterior ring apophysis fracture (PRAF) with lumbar disc herniation treated by immobile bony fragment excision. Summary of Literature Review: PRAF causes severe radiculopathy, so treating with surgery is common. Materials and Methods:A 30-year-old male diagnosed with PRAF with lumbar disc herniation was treated with discectomy, but his clinical symptoms were not relieved. Consequently, bony fragment excision, extended laminectomy and interbody fusion were also done. Results: Radicular pain was relieved and showed good clinical outcome. Conclusions: When treating PRAF, bony fragment excision and extended laminectomy should be considered even if an immobile bony fragment exists.