BackgroundAnnual hibernation is an adaptation that helps many animals conserve energy during food shortage in winter. This natural cycle is also accompanied by a remodeling of the intestinal immune system, which is an aspect of host biology that is both influenced by, and can itself influence, the microbiota. In amphibians, the bacteria in the intestinal tract show a drop in bacterial counts. The proportion of pathogenic bacteria is greater in hibernating frogs than that found in nonhibernating frogs. This suggests that some intestinal gut microbes in amphibians can be maintained and may contribute to the functions in this closed ecosystem during hibernation. However, these results were derived from culture-based approaches that only covered a small portion of bacteria in the intestinal tract.MethodsIn this study, we use a more comprehensive analysis, including bacterial appearance and functional prediction, to reveal the global changes in gut microbiota during artificial hibernation via high-throughput sequencing technology.ResultsOur results suggest that artificial hibernation in the brown tree frog (Polypedates megacephalus) could reduce microbial diversity, and artificially hibernating frogs tend to harbor core operational taxonomic units that are rarely distributed among nonhibernating frogs. In addition, artificial hibernation increased significantly the relative abundance of the red-leg syndrome-related pathogenic genus Citrobacter. Furthermore, functional predictions via PICRUSt and Tax4Fun suggested that artificial hibernation has effects on metabolism, disease, signal transduction, bacterial infection, and primary immunodeficiency.ConclusionsWe infer that artificial hibernation may impose potential effects on primary immunodeficiency and increase the risk of bacterial infections in the brown tree frog.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3318-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Background/Aim: Treatment of human non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often involves uses of multiple therapeutic strategies with different mechanisms of action. Here we found that resveratrol (RV) enhanced the anti-tumor effects of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib in NSCLC cells. Methods: Cell viability was measured by MTT assay and clonogenicity assay. Western blot was applied to assess the protein expression levels of target genes. Cell apoptosis was monitored by AnnexinV-FITC assay and sub-G1 population assay. Intracellular ROS were measured by flow cytometric analysis. Cell caspase activities were carried out by fluorometric assays. Results: Exposure of H460, A549, PC-9 and H1975 cells to minimal or non-toxic concentrations of RV and erlotinib synergistically reduced cell viability, colony formation and induced cell apoptosis. Furthermore, RV synergistically enhanced erlotinib-induced apoptosis was involved in ROS production. Additionally, co-treatment with RV and erlotinib repressed the expressions of anti-apoptosis proteins, such as survivin and Mcl-1, whereas promoted p53 and PUMA expression and caspase 3 activity. Moreover, the combination was also more effective at inhibiting the AKT/mTOR/S6 kinase pathway. Subsequently, small interfering RNA (siRNA) depletion of PUMA and overexpression of survivin significantly attenuated NSCLC cells apoptosis induced by the combination of the two drugs. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that RV synergistically enhanced the anti-tumor effects of erlotinib in NSCLC cells were involved in decrease of survivin expression and induction of PUMA expression. In conclusion, based on the observations from our study, we indicated that the combined administration of these two drugs might be considered as a novel therapeutic regimen for treating NSCLC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.