No abstract

No abstract

Background: In Singapore, English is predominantly used on prescription medication labels (PMLs). However, many older Singaporeans cannot read English, and among those who read English, their English health literacy (EHL) proficiency varies. It is thus pertinent to examine the link between EHL and medication use outcomes in this population. The present research aims to address this question. Methods: Data from a national survey, on 1167 home-dwelling elderly on ⩾1 prescribed medication was analysed. The validated Health Literacy Test for Singapore was used to determine EHL. Medication non-adherence was self-reported. Path analysis examined the association between limited EHL and medication non-adherence and tested possible mediators. Results: Limited EHL was associated with medication non-adherence (total effect=0.35; p-value: 0.032), and ‘uncertainty in taking medications correctly due to difficulty in understanding written information on PMLs’ was a significant mediator (indirect effect=0.23, 95% confidence interval (0.12–0.39)). Conclusions: Elderly people with limited EHL were significantly more likely than those with adequate EHL to report that they were uncertain about taking medications correctly because they had difficulty understanding the information on PMLs and this misunderstanding contributed to medication non-adherence. Interventions focused on incorporating bilingual text and/or pictograms on PMLs may reduce uncertainty in taking medication correctly and improve medication adherence among the elderly.

Background: Polypharmacy, given its link with drug interactions, potentially inappropriate medications and medication non-adherence, may pose a significant health risk, especially among the elderly. A comprehensive understanding of the epidemiology of polypharmacy is essential for countries facing population ageing and growing chronic disease burden, like Singapore. Objectives: We assessed the prevalence and risk factors of polypharmacy (⩾5 prescription medications) among community-dwelling elderly in Singapore and established the association of polypharmacy with medication non-adherence. Methods: We used data from a national sample of 1499 community-dwelling elderly aged ⩾66 years. Using logistic regression, we assessed the association of socio-demographic, health and healthcare use variables with polypharmacy, and polypharmacy with medication non-adherence. Results: The weighted prevalence of polypharmacy was 14.5%. In multivariable analysis, elderly who were men (versus women), with ⩾2 (versus 0–1) chronic diseases, aged ⩾85 (versus 66–69) years, and of Malay and Indian (versus Chinese) ethnicity were significantly more likely to have polypharmacy; healthcare use variables were not associated. Polypharmacy was significantly correlated with medication non-adherence. Conclusions: The prevalence of polypharmacy among community-dwelling elderly in Singapore is lower than that reported in other countries; however, polypharmacy is associated with medication non-adherence. Elderly subgroups, defined by gender, health status, age and ethnicity, who are at a higher risk of polypharmacy will benefit from medication review and de-prescribing services.

No abstract