The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy among patients with high thrombus burden. Routine manual thrombus aspiration in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) does not improve clinical outcomes and was associated with an increased rate of stroke. However, the safety of mechanical thrombus aspiration is still unknown. This was a retrospective, single-center study involving 621 patients with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction thrombus grade 5. The primary outcome was the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 12 months. The safety outcome was stroke within 1-year. Propensity matching score was calculated due to the significant baseline differences between the AngioJet rhelytic thrombectomy group and the routine treatment group. AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy was performed in 117 patients. After propensity-score matching, there was no significant difference both in the incidence of MACE (11.1% vs 17.9%, hazard ratio, 1.641; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.822 to 3.277, p = 0.161) and the incidences of stroke (1.7% vs 2.6%, hazard ratio 1.522; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.254 to 9.107, p = 0.646) between two groups at 1-year follow-up. In patients with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction thrombus grade 5, AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy did not improve clinical outcomes at 1 year. However, AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy did not increase the risk of stroke in patients with high thrombus burden.
Aim: Intracoronary murmur results from turbulent flow due to coronary artery narrowing. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a method for acoustic analysis of turbulent murmur caused by coronary artery stenosis in coronary artery disease (CAD) in Chinese populations. Method: Patients admitted to the cardiovascular department of the Sixth Medical Center of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital between September 2021 and June 2022 for elective coronary angiography were prospectively enrolled. A digital electronic stethoscope was used to record heart sounds before angiography. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) served as the “gold standard” for CAD diagnosis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the acoustic analysis method for CAD. Results: A total of 452 patients had complete QCA and heart sound data. The final interpretation results of the acoustic analysis method indicated 310 disease cases and 142 normal results. Increasing the cut-off values of coronary artery diameter stenosis from 30% to 50%, 70%, and 90% increased the sensitivity and NPV of the acoustic analysis method; the sensitivity was 75.6%, 81.9%, 83.3%, and 85.7%, respectively; the NPV was 33.1%, 57.0%, 69.7%, and 88.0%, respectively; the specificity and PPV decreased (specificity of 75.8%, 70.4%, 51.0%, and 37.5%, respectively; PPV of 95.2%, 89.0%, 69.4%, and 32.9%, respectively); and the AUC values were 0.757, 0.762, 0.672, and 0.616, respectively. The sensitivity of the acoustic analysis method for one-vessel disease was 86.6% when the cut-off value was 50%. The sensitivity for identifying left anterior descending coronary artery lesions was best, at 90.7%. The sensitivity for identifying isolated coronary artery branch lesions was 66.7%, whereas the sensitivity for identifying three-vessel disease in multi-vessel coronary artery lesions was better, at 82.9%. Conclusion: Acoustic analysis of turbulent murmur caused by coronary artery stenosis for diagnosis of CAD may have favorable performance in the Chinese population. This method has good performance in CAD diagnosis with a cut-off coronary artery diameter for stenosis of 50%.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.