Some
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) tend to be accumulated
in liver and cause hepatotoxicity. However, the difficulty to directly
measure liver concentrations of PFASs in humans hampers our understanding
of their hepatotoxicity and mechanisms of action. We investigated
the partitioning of 11 PFASs between liver and blood in male CD-1
mice. Although accumulation of the perfluoroalkanesulfonic acids (PFSAs)
in mice serum was higher than their carboxylic acids (PFCAs) counterparts
as expected, the liver-blood partition coefficients (R
L/S) of PFSAs were lower than the PFCAs R
L/S, implying a competition between liver and blood. The in vitro experiments further indicated that the partitioning
was dominantly determined by their competitive binding between human
liver fatty acid binding protein (hL-FABP) and serum albumin (HSA).
The binding affinities (K
d) of PFASs to
both proteins were measured. The correlations between the R
L/S and log K
d (hL‑FABP)/log K
d (HSA) were stronger than
those with log K
d (hL‑FABP) alone, magnifying that the partitioning was dominantly controlled
by competitive binding between hL-FABP and HSA. Therefore, the liver
concentrations of the selected PFASs in humans could be predicted
from the available serum concentrations, which is important for assessing
their hepatotoxicity.
Food is a major source of human exposure
to per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFASs), yet little is known about their bioavailability
in food matrices. Here, the relative bioavailability (RBA) of PFASs
in foods was determined using an in vivo mouse model.
Pork, which had the highest lipid content, exhibited the greatest
effect on bioavailability by increasing the RBAs of perfluoroalkyl
acids (PFAAs) while reducing those of fluorotelomer phosphate diesters
(diPAPs). During intestinal digestion of lipids, the bioaccessibility
of PFAAs increased due to their greater partition into the stable
mixed micelles. However, diPAPs were more likely to partition into
the undigested oil phase due to their strong hydrophobicity. Both in vitro incubation and molecular docking results indicated
that the PFAAs exhibited stronger binding affinities with mouse blood
chylomicrons (CMs) than with diPAPs. Collectively, both lipid digestion
in the intestine and the carrier effect of CMs played important roles
in modulating the bioavailability of PFASs in food. More attention
should be given to further evaluating the health risks of PFASs associated
with the intake of high-lipid foods.
As alternatives to traditional per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, perfluoroalkyl phosphonic acids (PFPiAs) are frequently detected in aquatic environments, but the neurotoxic effects and underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, male zebrafish were exposed to 6:6 PFPiA (1 and 10 nM) for 28 days, which exhibited anxiety-like symptoms. Gut microbiome results indicated that 6:6 PFPiA significantly increased the abundance of Gram-negative bacteria, leading to enhanced levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and inflammation in the gut. The LPS was delivered to the brain through the gut− brain axis (GBA), damaged the blood−brain barrier (BBB), stimulated neuroinflammation, and caused apoptosis as well as neural injury in the brain. This mechanism was verified by the fact that antibiotics reduced the LPS levels in the gut and brain, accompanied by reduced inflammatory responses and anxiety-like behavior. The BBB damage also resulted in the enhanced accumulation of 6:6 PFPiA in the brain, where it might bind strongly with and activate aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) to induce brain inflammation directly. Additionally, as the fish received treatment with an inhibitor of AhR, the inflammation response and anxiety-like behavior decreased distinctly. This study sheds light on the new mechanisms of neurotoxicity-induced 6:6 PFPiA due to the interruption on GBA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.