Hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease is an important and attractive target for anti-HCV drug development and discovery. Vaniprevir (phase III clinical trials) and MK-5172 (phase II clinical trials) are two potent antiviral compounds that target NS3/4A protease. However, the emergence of resistance to these two inhibitors reduced the effectiveness of vaniprevir and MK-5172 against viral replication. Among the drug resistance mutations, three single-site mutations at residues Arg155, Ala156, and Asp168 in NS3/4A protease are especially important due to their resistance to nearly all inhibitors in clinical development. A detailed understanding of drug resistance mechanism to vaniprevir and MK-5172 is therefore very crucial for the design of novel potent agents targeting viral variants. In this work, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, binding free energy calculation, free energy decomposition, residue interaction network (RIN), and substrate envelope analysis were used to study the detailed drug resistance mechanism of the three mutants R155K, A156T, and D168A to vaniprevir and MK-5172. MD simulation was used to investigate the binding mode for these two inhibitors to wild-type and resistant mutants of HCV NS3/4A protease. Binding free energy calculation and free energy decomposition analysis reveal that drug resistance mutations reduced the interactions between the active site residues and substituent in the P2 to P4 linker of vaniprevir and MK-5172. Furthermore, RIN and substrate envelope analysis indicate that the studied mutations of the residues are located outside the substrate (4B5A) binding site and selectively decrease the affinity of inhibitors but not the activity of the enzyme and consequently help NS3/4A protease escape from the effect of the inhibitors without influencing the affinity of substrate binding. These findings can provide useful information for understanding the drug resistance mechanism against vaniprevir and MK-5172. The results can also provide some potential clues for further design of novel inhibitors that are less susceptible to drug resistance.
β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) regulated many key physiological processes by activation of a heterotrimeric GTP binding protein (Gs protein). This process could be modulated by different types of ligands. But the details about this modulation process were still not depicted. Here, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on the structures of β2AR-Gs protein in complex with different types of ligands. The simulation results demonstrated that the agonist BI-167107 could form hydrogen bonds with Ser2035.42, Ser2075.46 and Asn2936.55 more than the inverse agonist ICI 118,551. The different binding modes of ligands further affected the conformation of β2AR. The energy landscape profiled the energy contour map of the stable and dissociated conformation of Gαs and Gβγ when different types of ligands bound to β2AR. It also showed the minimum energy pathway about the conformational change of Gαs and Gβγ along the reaction coordinates. By using interactive essential dynamics analysis, we found that Gαs and Gβγ domain of Gs protein had the tendency to separate when the inverse agonist ICI 118,551 bound to β2AR. The α5-helix had a relatively quick movement with respect to transmembrane segments of β2AR when the inverse agonist ICI 118,551 bound to β2AR. Besides, the analysis of the centroid distance of Gαs and Gβγ showed that the Gαs was separated from Gβγ during the MD simulations. Our results not only could provide details about the different types of ligands that induced conformational change of β2AR and Gs protein, but also supplied more information for different efficacies of drug design of β2AR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.