Objective. Meta-analysis was conducted to explore the effects of CM combined with chemotherapy on the effective rate and survival rate of gastric cancer patients. Methods. Literature retrieval was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CNKI databases. The subject of the literature was to compare the efficacy of CM combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in patients with gastric cancer. According to the Cochrane manual, the risk of bias was assessed for inclusion in randomized controlled trials. The chi-square test was used for the heterogeneity test. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore the causes of heterogeneity. Funnel chart and Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias. Results. This study included 761 patients with gastric cancer from 10 literatures. The effective rate of chemotherapy in the CM combined group was higher than that in the chemotherapy alone group (odds ratio OR = 1.96 , 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.39, 2.78), Z = 3.81 , P = 0.0001 ), and there was no heterogeneity among studies ( ch i 2 = 5.68 , P = 0.68 , I 2 = 0 %). There was no significant publication bias among all studies ( P > 0.05 ). The one-year survival rate in the CM combined group was higher than that in the chemotherapy alone group ( OR = 3.25 , 95% CI (1.90, 5.54), Z = 4.32 , P < 0.0001 ). There was no heterogeneity among studies ( ch i 2 = 1.04 , P = 0.79 , I 2 = 0 %) and no significant publication bias among studies ( P > 0.05 ). The 3-year survival rate of gastric cancer patients in the traditional Chinese medicine combination group was higher than that in the chemotherapy alone group ( OR = 1.71 , 95% CI (1.06, 2.78), Z = 2.18 , P = 0.03 ). There was no heterogeneity among studies ( ch i 2 = 2.18 , P = 0.54 , I 2 = 0 %), and there was no significant publication bias ( P > 0.05 ). The incidence of nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients in the Chinese medicine combination group was lower than that in the chemotherapy alone group ( OR = 0.47 , 95% CI (0.34, 0.64), Z = 4.80 , P < 0.00001 ). There was no heterogeneity among studies ( ch i 2 = 8.57 , P = 0.48 , I 2 = 0 %), and there was no significant publication bias ( P > 0.05 ). Conclusion. CM combined with chemotherapy can improve the effective rate and survival rate of gastric cancer and reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy. We recommend a large sample size, multicenter combined randomized controlled trial for validation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.