AbstractŞırnak City and the surrounding areas are on steeper slopes. There are sliding large land masses or rocks. Underground water and harsh climatic conditions contain high risk hazard areas in urban living site with higher population density. In order to eliminate landslides and related events, significant precautions should be taken. The mapping of landslide risk may ease to take precautions. Even the application of landfill rock may reduce water content of soil. In this research, fly ash and Mine Waste shale stone were used with low density foam concrete. Waste mixture at certain proportions decreased cement use. Shale stone as fine aggregate instead of fly ash in specific proportions improved mechanical strength and porosity. Hence landslide hazardous area could be safer for urban living.

Coal mining sites and copper sulphide mines caused polluting acidic mine waters. Acidic mine drainage (AMD) into the natural streams and agricultural field irrigation waters causes environmental pollution with dissolved contents having heavy metals or acidic aqueous solutions of habitats and living fish in the local ponds and irrigation ponds. It is necessary to collect the polluted mine waters in the impermeable ponds and treat or neutralize the acidic character by the aeration treatment and subsequently discharge to the stream waters. This study introduced chemical neutralization and aeration treatment of polluted acidic waters in Şırnak Coal Mine site and Siirt Copper Concentrator site as happens in wastewaters of chemical industries and textile processing plants. The construction engineering of collector ponds was also so much critical in the point of cost of a case remediation model and muddy fertilization by Şırnak Thermal Power Plant waste, bottom ash, and fly ash in agricultural fields soil in Şırnak Coal Mine site, and how these facts may affect the possibility of remediation in the future were discussed. Organic fertilizer matter of fumic acid and humic acid containing humate formed. Soil remediation process for both muddy bottom precipitates of treatment pools and aeration pools was collected and treated by CO 2 saturatedwaters. The comparison of the common methods is described and discussed with fly ash utilization and CO 2 gas of power plants containing alkali matter improved neutralization and carbon matter of soils.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract