No abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate the characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques in stroke‐related vascular beds and their relationship with stroke using three‐dimensional magnetic resonance (MR) vessel wall imaging.MethodsFifty‐two symptomatic patients (mean age: 56.3 ± 13.4 years; 38 males) were enrolled and underwent MR vessel wall imaging for stroke‐related vascular beds including intracranial and extracranial carotid arteries and aortic arch and routine MR imaging for brain. The maximum wall thickness (Max WT) and luminal stenosis of each plaque were measured. The presence/absence of atherosclerotic plaque, intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), and severe stenosis (stenosis >50%) at each vascular bed and acute ischemic lesion (AIL) were determined. The correlation between Max WT of each vascular bed and AIL was analyzed.ResultsOf 52 patients, 24 (46.2%) had AILs, and 30 (57.7%), 34 (65.4%), and 11 (21.2%) had plaques in intracranial artery, extracranial carotid artery, and aortic arch, respectively. The prevalence of IPH and severe stenosis was 25% and 26.9% for intracranial arteries, 13.5% and 9.6% for extracranial carotid artery, and 3.8% and 0% for aortic arch, respectively. In discriminating AIL, Max WT of intracranial artery had the highest area‐under‐the‐curve (AUC = 0.84), followed by extracranial carotid artery (AUC = 0.83) and aortic arch (AUC = 0.78) after adjusted for confounding factors. The AUC of Max WT combined three stroked‐related vascular beds reached 0.87.ConclusionExtracranial carotid arteries have the highest prevalence of plaques and intraplaque hemorrhage and severe stenosis are most frequently seen in intracranial arteries in Asian symptomatic patients. The Max WT combined three stroke‐related vascular beds show stronger predictive value for AIL than each vascular bed alone.

Background: It has been proven that magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound imaging are useful tools in the quantification of carotid atherosclerotic plaques. However, there are only a few pieces of evidence to illustrate the links of quantitative measurements of carotid plaques between MR and ultrasound imaging.This study looked to compare the quantitative measurements of carotid plaques and investigate their relationship between three-dimensional (3D) MR vessel wall imaging and two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound imaging.Methods: Seventy-five asymptomatic elderly subjects (mean age: 73.3±5.7 years; 45 males) with carotid atherosclerotic plaques diagnosed by both ultrasound and MR imaging were included in this study. The plaque size, including the maximum wall thickness (Max WT), plaque length, and plaque area, was measured by 3D MR and ultrasound imaging on longitudinal and cross-sectional views. The quantitative assessments of carotid plaque size were compared and correlated between 3D MR and 2D ultrasound imaging.Results: In total, the quantitative measurements of 101 plaques on longitudinal views or 44 plaques on cross-sectional views of both MR and ultrasound imaging were compared. The Max WT of the plaques (longitudinal: 2.9±0.8 vs. 2.4±0.9 mm; cross-sectional: 3.2±1.1 vs. 2.6±0.7 mm) and plaque areas (longitudinal: 24.3±13.4 vs. 17.0±12.7 mm 2 ; cross-sectional: 24.9±24.6 vs. 16.8±13.3 mm 2 ) measured by MR imaging were found to be significantly higher than those measured by ultrasound imaging (all P<0.001). Moderate to strong correlations were found in Max WT, plaque area, plaque length between 3D MR and ultrasound imaging. Conclusions:The quantitative measurements of carotid plaques using 3D MR and 2D ultrasound are significantly correlated. The plaque area and Max WT measured by 3D MR imaging are more significant than these parameters measured by 2D ultrasound imaging, which might be explained by the resolution of MR imaging and the workflow of measurements.

No abstract

No abstract