Background. Reprogramming of lipid metabolism is closely associated with tumor development, serving as a common and critical metabolic feature that emerges during tumor evolution. Meanwhile, immune cells in the tumor microenvironment also undergo aberrant lipid metabolism, and altered lipid metabolism also has an impact on the function and status of immune cells, further promoting malignant biological behavior. Consequently, we focused on lipid metabolism-related genes for constructing a novel prognostic marker and evaluating immune status in prostate cancer. Methods. Information about prostate cancer patients was obtained from TCGA and GEO databases. The NMF algorithm was conducted to identify the molecular subtypes. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression analysis was applied to establish a prognostic risk signature. CIBERSORT algorithm was used to calculate immune cell infiltration levels in prostate cancer. External clinical validation data were used to validate the results. Results. Prostate cancer samples were divided into two subtypes according to the NMF algorithm. A six-gene risk signature (PTGS2, SGPP2, ALB, PLA2G2A, SRD5A2, and SLC2A4) was independent of prognosis and showed good stability. There were significant differences between risk groups of patients with respect to the infiltration of immune cells and clinical variables. Response to immunotherapy also differed between different risk groups. Furthermore, the mRNA expression levels of the signature genes were verified in tissue samples by qRT-PCR. Conclusion. We constructed a six-gene signature with lipid metabolism in prostate cancer to effectively predict prognosis and reflect immune microenvironment status.
Background. Aberrant lipid metabolism is an alteration common to many types of cancer. Dysregulation of lipid metabolism is considered a major risk factor for bladder cancer. Accordingly, we focused on genes related to lipid metabolism and screened novel markers for predicting the prognosis of bladder cancer. Methods. RNA-seq data for bladder cancer were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. The nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) algorithm was used to classify the molecular subtypes. Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) was applied to identify coexpressed genes, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) multivariate Cox analysis was used to construct a prognostic risk model. External validation data and in vitro experiments were used to verify the results from in silico analysis. Results. Bladder cancer samples were grouped into two clusters based on the NMF algorithm. A total of 1467 genes involved in coexpression modules were identified in WGCNA. We finally established a 5-gene signature (TM4SF1, KCNK5, FASN, IMPDH1, and KCNJ15) that exhibited good stability across different datasets and was also an independent risk factor for prognosis. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of our model was generally higher than the predictive efficacy of other published models. Distinct risk groups of patients also showed significantly different immune infiltration cell patterns and associations with clinical variables. Moreover, the 5 signature genes were verified in clinical samples by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry, which were in agreement with the in silico analysis. For in vitro experiments, knockdown of IMPDH1 markedly inhibited cell proliferation in bladder cancer. Conclusion. We established a 5-gene prognosis signature based on lipid metabolism in bladder cancer, which could be an effective prognostic indicator.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.