We downloaded gene expression data, clinical data, and somatic mutation data of cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases. Predictive lncRNAs were screened using univariate analysis and lasso regression, and risk score of each patient were calculated according to the expression levels of lncRNAs and regression coe cients to establish a risk model that could be a novel signature. We assessed the correlation between immune in ltration status, chemotherapeutics sensitivity, immune checkpoint proteins (ICP) and the signature. Therefore, we selected 11 immune-related lncRNAs (WWC2,
Background According to reports, between 30 and 40 percent of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) cases are caused by urinary tract tuberculosis (UTB). It is critical to identify UTB quickly since it frequently precedes delayed medical attention, which can have detrimental effects. This study examined the use of Xpert MTB/RIF, a PCR test that can detect MTB as well as resistance to an important drug, rifampicin (RIF), in UTB particularly, for the early identification of UTB. Methods 180 participants with clinically presumptive UTB whose urine samples were chosen for urine sediment smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and TB-DNA testing at Henan Chest Hospital between January 2019 and July 2022. Evaluation of test performance using Composite Reference Standards (CRSs). We studied and compared the positivity rate for various tests using the t-test. The effectiveness of smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and TB-DNA was assessed using McNemar test. Results In this subject, a total of 108 participants were diagnosed with UTB, and the positivity rate was 67.1%. Compared with CRS, the positivity rate of Xpert MTB/RIF, smear, culture, and TB-DNA was 29.69% (19/64, P < 0.001), 7.56% (9/119, P < 0.1), 12.12% (4/33, P > 0.05), and 18.75% (6/32, P < 0.1), respectively. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay was significantly better than that of smear and culture tests (78.9% vs. 77.8%, P < 0.05; 78.9% vs. 75%, P < 0.05). Under CRS, the positivity rate for Xpert, culture, and TB-DNA was 31.6% (6/19, P < 0.1), 6.2% (1/16, P > 0.05), and 26.7% (4/15, P > 0.05) for TB-DNA, respectively, compared to smear negative. Xpert MTB/RIF assay specificity was significant for culture and TB-DNA (53.6% vs. 25%, P < 0.01; 53.6% vs. 38.9%, P < 0.05), and Xpert MTB/RIF assay FPV was significant for culture and TB-DNA (53.6% vs. 0%, P < 0.001; 53.6% vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Conclusion Xpert MTB/RIF outperforms smear, cultures, and TB-DNA in detecting UTB, plus Xpert MTB/RIF is better suited for early diagnosis in smear-negative UTB.
Background: According to reports, between 30 and 40 percent of extrapulmonary TB cases are caused by urinary tract tuberculosis (UTB). It is critical to identify UTB quickly since it frequently precedes delayed medical attention, which can have detrimental effects. This study examined the use of Xpert MTB/RIF, a rifampicin-inhibited continuous fluorescence quantitative nucleic corrosive enhancement discovery innovation, in urine tuberculosis (UTB), particularly for the early identification of UTB. Methods: 180 patients with clinically suspected UTB whose urine samples were chosen for urine sediment smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and TB-DNA testing at Henan Chest Hospital between January 2019 and July 2022. We studied and compared the positive rates for various tests using the t-test. Results: In this subject, a total of 108 patients were diagnosed with urinary tract tuberculosis, and the positive detection rate was 67.1%. Among patients with urinary tract tuberculosis, the highest positive rate of a single test was Xpert MTB/RIF, reaching 29.69% (19/64, P<0.001), and the positive rates of the other three test items were: TB-DNA positive rate was 18.75% (6/32, P<0.1), the positive rate of culture was 12.12% (4/33, P>0.05), and the positive rate of smear was 7.56% (9/119, P<0.01). For the smear-negative group, Xpert MTB/RIF had the highest detection rate of 31.6% (6/19, P<0.1). Conclusion: Xpert MTB/RIF assay has high application value in the diagnosis of urinary tract tuberculosis. It can be widely used in clinical early diagnosis of urinary tract tuberculosis.
The association between polymorphisms in lncRNA H19 and cancer susceptibility remains to be inconsistent. This study aimed to provide a more precise estimation of the relationship between lncRNA H19 polymorphisms and the risk of cancer based on all available published studies. 53 studies encompassing 32,376 cases and 43,659 controls were included in our meta-analysis by searching the Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, WanFang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. Pooled ORs and their 95% CIs were used to estimate the strength between the SNPs in H19 (rs217727, rs2839698, rs2107425, rs3024270, rs2735971, rs3741216, and rs3741219) and cancer susceptibility. The results showed that H19 rs2839698 polymorphism was associated with increased cancer risk in all participants under three genetic models. However, no significant association was identified between the other six SNPs as well as an overall cancer risk. Stratification by ethnicity showed that rs2839698 mutation indicated to be an important hazardous factor for the Asian population. While rs2107425 mutation had a protective effect on the Caucasian population. Stratification by cancer type identified that rs217727 mutation was linked to increased susceptibility to oral squamous cell carcinoma, lung cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma; whereas rs2839698 mutation was associated with an elevated risk of hematological tumor and digestive system tumor (p < 0.05). Besides, the rs2735971 mutation was connected with the digestive system tumor. In summary, the rs217727, rs2839698, rs2107425 and rs2735971 polymorphisms in H19 have associations with cancer susceptibility.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.