Background: To investigate the correlation between Y chromosome microdeletion and cytogenetic analysis in patients with azoospermia.Methods: A total of 516 patients with azoospermia were enrolled from March 2015 to December 2019. Karyotype analysis(G-banding) was performed with peripheral blood.Y-chromosome azoospermia factor (AZF) were detected by quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR).Results: Chromosome abnormality was detected in 66 of the 516 azoospermia patients, with an abnormal rate of 12.8% In addition, 7.8% cases(40/516) presented with Y-chromosome AZF microdeletions, in which 27 cases patients with karyotype of 46,XY(67.5%,27/40) and 13 cases of chromosome abnormalities (32.5%,13/40).Conclusion: The incidence of Y chromosome microdeletion was higher in the patients with karyotype of 46,XY. Conventional cytogenetics cannot directly reflect the microdeletions of Y chromosome. Therefore, the combination of this two detection methods can help to clarify the genetic causes of patients with azoospermia and provide a theoretical basis for clinical assisted reproductive technology.

Background The mosaic forms and clinical phenotypes of fetuses with isochromosome Y are difficult to predict. Therefore, we summarized the cases of nine fetuses with isochromosome Y identified in prenatal diagnosis with a combination of molecular cytogenetic techniques, providing clinical evidence for prenatal genetic counseling. Methods The prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes of nine fetuses with isochromosome Y were obtained by a  retrospective analysis. Isochromosome Y was identified prenatally by different approaches, such as conventional karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Results Seven idic(Y) fetuses and two i(Y) fetuses were identified. One fetus was complete for i(Y)(p10), and the rest with 45,X had mosaic forms. A break and fusion locus was identified in Yp11.3 in one fetus, in Yq11.22 in six fetuses and in Yp10 in two fetuses. The CMA results suggested that different deletions and duplications were found on the Y chromosome. The deletion fragments ranged from 4.7 Mb to the entire Y chromosome, and the duplication fragments ranged from 10.4 to 18.0 Mb. QF-PCR analysis suggested that the AZF region was intact in one fetus, four fetuses had AZFb+c+d deletion, one fetus had AZFa+b+c+d deletion, and one fetus had AZFc+d deletion. Finally, four healthy male neonates were delivered successfully, but the parents of the remaining five fetuses, including three healthy and two unhealthy fetuses, chose to terminate their pregnancies. Conclusion The fetus and neonate phenotype of prenatally detected isochromosome Y usually is that of a normally developed male, ascertained in the absence of other indicators of a fetal structural anomaly. Our study provides clinical reference materials for risk assessment and permits better prenatally counseling and preparation of parents facing the birth of isochromosome Y fetuses.