1.5 T mpMRI using the PI-RADS to localize the index tumor achieved moderate reliability and diagnostic performance.

Objective• To evaluate the performance of real-time elastography (RTE) in an initial biopsy setting. Patients and Methods• In the period from February 2011 to June 2012, 127 consecutive patients were included in the study.• We used a Hitachi Preirus with Hi-RTE module, a prostate end-fire transrectal probe was used for RTE and for targeted biopsies, and a simultaneous biplane probe was used for the standard systematic biopsies.• The peripheral zone of the prostate was divided into six regions, and each biopsy obtained was referred to a specific region.• All patients were first examined with RTE and, if cancer was suspected, targeted biopsies were taken. A standard systematic 10-core biopsy was then taken in all patients. Results• In all, 64 (50%) patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer in the initial biopsy setting. Three patients were diagnosed solely on RTE-targeted biopsies, 31 were found only in systematic biopsies, and 30 were correctly diagnosed with both methods.• In the RTE-positive group there was a significantly higher frequency of positive cores, a lower prostate volume, a higher Gleason score, and a higher fraction of cancer tissue in each core.• In a multiple regression model RTE was an independent marker for high-risk cancer.• The sensitivity of 42% for all prostate cancers increased to 60% for high-grade prostate cancers.• Similarly, the negative predictive value increased from 79% to 97%. An additional eight patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer during the study period. Conclusions• A positive RTE is an independent marker for detection of high-risk prostate cancer, and a negative RTE argues against such.• RTE with targeted biopsies cannot replace systematic biopsies, but provides valuable additional information about the tumours.

The combination of PCA3 score and RTE detected 97% of significant prostate cancers. The combinative use of RTE and PCA3 will be further investigated in an unselected series of men with suspected prostate cancer.

There is no consensus on how to treat high-risk prostate cancer, and long-term results from hypofractionated radiation therapy are lacking. We report 10-year results after image guided, intensity modulated radiation therapy with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost and elective pelvic field. Methods and Materials: Between 2007 and 2009, 97 consecutive patients with high-risk prostate cancer were included, treated with 2.7 to 2.0 Gy  25 Gy to the prostate, seminal vesicles, and elective pelvic field. Toxicity was scored according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria and biochemical disease-free survival (BFS) defined by the Phoenix definition. Patients were subsequently divided into 3 groups: high risk (HR; n Z 32), very high risk (VHR; n Z 50), and Nþ/seprostate-specific antigen (PSA) !100 (n Z 15). Differences in outcomes were examined using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: BFS in the patients at HR and VHR was 64%, metastasis-free survival 80%, prostate cancer-specific survival 90%, and overall survival (OS) 72%. VHR versus HR subgroups demonstrated significantly different BFS, 54% versus 79% (P Z .01). Metastasis-free survival and prostate cancer-specific survival in the VHR group versus HR group were 76% versus 87% (P Z .108) and 74% versus

PurposeTo improve preoperative risk stratification for prostate cancer (PCa) by incorporating multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) features into risk stratification tools for PCa, CAPRA and D’Amico.Methods807 consecutive patients operated on by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our institution during the period 2010–2015 were followed to identify biochemical recurrence (BCR). 591 patients were eligible for final analysis. We employed stepwise backward likelihood methodology and penalised Cox cross-validation to identify the most significant predictors of BCR including mpMRI features. mpMRI features were then integrated into image-adjusted (IA) risk prediction models and the two risk prediction tools were then evaluated both with and without image adjustment using receiver operating characteristics, survival and decision curve analyses.Results37 patients suffered BCR. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and radiological extraprostatic extension (rEPE) from mpMRI were both significant predictors of BCR. Both IA prediction models reallocated more than 20% of intermediate-risk patients to the low-risk group, reducing their estimated cumulative BCR risk from approximately 5% to 1.1%. Both IA models showed improved prognostic performance with a better separation of the survival curves.ConclusionIntegrating ADC and rEPE from mpMRI of the prostate into risk stratification tools improves preoperative risk estimation for BCR.Key points• MRI-derived features, ADC and EPE, improve risk stratification of biochemical recurrence. • Using mpMRI to stratify prostate cancer patients improves the differentiation between risk groups. • Using preoperative mpMRI will help urologists in selecting the most appropriate treatment. Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-017-5031-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.