No abstract

The depth of 61 aftershocks of the 2015 April 25 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake, that occurred within the first 20 d following the main shock, is constrained using time delays between teleseismic P phases and depth phases (pP and sP). The detection and identification of these phases are automatically processed using the cepstral method developed by Letort et al., and are validated with computed radiation patterns from the most probable focal mechanisms. The events are found to be relatively shallow (13.1 ± 3.9 km). Because depth estimations could potentially be biased by the method, velocity model or selected data, we also evaluate the depth resolution of the events from local catalogues by extracting 138 events with assumed well-constrained depth estimations. Comparison between the teleseismic depths and the depths from local and regional catalogues helps decrease epistemic uncertainties, and shows that the seismicity is clustered in a narrow band between 10 and 15 km depth. Given the geometry and depth of the major tectonic structures, most aftershocks are probably located in the immediate vicinity of the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT) shear zone. The mid-crustal ramp of the flat/ramp MHT system is not resolved indicating that its height is moderate (less than 5−10 km) in the trace of the sections that ruptured on April 25. However, the seismicity depth range widens and deepens through an adjacent section to the east, a region that failed on 2015 May 12 during an M w 7.3 earthquake. This deeper seismicity could reflect a step-down of the basal detachment of the MHT, a lateral structural variation which probably acted as a barrier to the dynamic rupture propagation.

: A new, improved and fully automatic method for teleseismic depth estimation of moderate earthquakes (4.5 < M < 5.5): application to the Guerrero subduction zone (Mexico). -Geophysical Journal International, 201, p. 1834-1848 • ) through the study of the spectral holes in the shape of the signal spectrum. The ability of our automatic method to improve depth estimations is shown by relocation of the recent moderate seismicity of the Guerrero subduction area (Mexico). We have therefore estimated the depth of 152 events using teleseismic data from the IRIS stations and arrays. One advantage of this method is that it can be applied for single stations (from IRIS) as well as for classical arrays. In the Guerrero area, our new cepstral analysis efficiently clusters event locations and provides an improved view of the geometry of the subduction. Moreover, we have also validated our method through relocation of the same events using the new International Seismological Centre (ISC)-locator algorithm, as well as comparing our cepstral depths with the available Harvard-Centroid Moment Tensor (CMT) solutions and the three available ground thrust (GT5) events (where lateral localization is assumed to be well constrained with uncertainty <5 km) for this area. These comparisons indicate an overestimation of focal depths in the ISC catalogue for deeper parts of the subduction, and they show a systematic bias between the estimated cepstral depths and the ISC-locator depths. Using information from the CMT catalogue relating to the predominant focal mechanism for this area, this bias can be explained as a misidentification of sP phases by pP phases, which shows the greater interest for the use of this new automatic cepstral analysis, as it is less sensitive to phase identification.

No abstract

No abstract