Aims We evaluated the impact of MitraClip on systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) and the effects of baseline sPAP on outcomes. Methods and results In a cohort of patients who underwent MitraClip implantation, three groups were defined according to pre-procedure sPAP levels. Clinical and echocardiographic data were compared. The study included 177 patients: 59 had severe pulmonary hypertension (PHT), 96 had mild to moderate PHT, and 22 had no PHT. In patients with pre-existing severe PHT, sPAP was reduced from 70.8 ± 9.2 to 56.8 ± 13.7 mmHg (P < 0.001), sPAP remained unchanged in patients with mild to moderate PHT but was significantly increased from 30.8 ± 4.3 to 38.6 ± 8.3 mmHg in the no-PHT group (P < 0.001). Improvement of sPAP was observed in 77% of severe PHT group, while worsening of sPAP was more common among patients with no-PHT [57% compared with 33% among the mild to moderate PHT and 7% in the severe PHT group, respectively, (P < 0.001)]. One year survival was similar among the study groups. Conclusions MitraClip decreases PHT among patients with severe PHT. A concerning finding is that most patients with no-PHT increase their sPAP.

Introduction Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR), such as MitraClip, is performed on high‐risk patients and involves hemodynamic alternations that may cause acute kidney injury (AKI). We aimed to evaluate the incidence of AKI, predictors for developing AKI and the correlation with mortality after MitraClip. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of collected data from patients who underwent PMVR in two tertiary medical centers in Israel to identify factors associated with AKI. Results The study population included 163 patients. The median age was 77 years; 60.7% of patients were male. The median eGFR significantly decreased post‐procedure from 49 (35–72) to 47.8 (31–65.5) ml/min/1.73 m2 (p < .001). Forty‐seven patients (29%) developed AKI. None of the patients who developed AKI required hemodialysis. Predictors of AKI included: baseline eGFR ≤30 ml/min/1.73 m2, severity of residual MR, TMPG>5 mmHg, diuretic use, and re‐do procedures. Among the patients who developed AKI there was an improvement in kidney function during follow‐up, and creatinine levels significantly decreased from a peak mean creatinine of 179.5 (143–252) mmol/l to 136 (92–174) mmol/l (p < .001). However, 19% (9 out of 47) of patients experienced partial recovery and their creatinine level, when compared to their baseline, remained elevated. One‐year survival showed a trend for increased mortality among patients who developed AKI (86.2% vs. 80.9%, p = .4), and patients who developed AKI that persisted had increased 1‐year mortality compared with patients that had recovered their kidney function (86.8% vs. 55.6%, p = .01). Conclusion The incidence of AKI after MitraClip is high. AKI is reversible in most patients; however, the persistence of kidney injury is associated with increased 1‐year mortality.

The role of percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVr) in management of high-risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is undetermined. We screened all patients who underwent PMVr between October 2015 and March 2020. We evaluated immediate, 30-day, and 1-year outcomes in patients who underwent PMVr during hospitalization due to ADHF as compared to elective patients. From a cohort of 237 patients, we identified 46 patients (19.4%) with severe MR of either functional or degenerative etiology who underwent PMVr during index hospitalization due to ADHF, including 17 (37%) critically ill patients. Patients’ mean age was 75.2 ± 9.8 years, 56% were males. There were no differences in background history between ADHF and elective patients. Patients with ADHF were at higher risk for surgery, reflected in higher mean EuroSCORE II, compared with elective patients. After PMVr, we observed higher 30-day mortality rate in ADHF patients as compared to the elective group (10.9% vs. 3.1%, respectively, p = 0.042). One-year mortality rate was similar between the groups (21.7% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.493). Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up showed improvement of NYHA functional class and sPAP reduction in both groups ((54 ± 15 mmHg to 50 ±15 in the elective group (p = 0.02), 58 ± 13 mmHg to 52 ± 12 in the ADHF group (p = 0.02)). PMVr could be an alternative option for treatment of patients with severe MR and ADHF.

Background MitraClip implantation improves mitral regurgitation (MR), however its impact on pulmonary hypertension (PHT) is not fully elucidated. Our hypothesis was that changes in pulmonary pressure after MitraClip implantation might predict outcomes. Methods We studied a cohort of 149 consecutive patients who underwent MitraClip implantation between August 2015 and September 2019. We compared echocardiographic and clinical variables between a group with not-severe PHT and a group with severe PHT according to Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) &gt;55 mmHg. Results Mean age of the cohort was 73±10 years, 75% were men, and 80% had functional MR. There are no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. There was a significant reduction of 13.6 mmHg in PASP at the severe PHT group from 68.2±10.9 mmHg before the procedure to 54.6±14.9 after (P=0.001) compared to the absence of a significant change in the second group. This reduction was maintained in the 6 months follow-up. Although PHT is considered a poor prognostic measure, and the severe PHT group had a baseline PASP higher than the not-severe group (P&lt;0.001), however the Kaplan Meier curve did not show any significant difference in overall survival (p=0.468), and there is also no difference in one-year survival. Conclusions MitraClip therapy improves PASP in patients with severe MR and severe PHT. These patients showed the same survival as patients with not-severe PHT. MitraClip is a safety and effective procedure even for patients with severe PHT, that should not be excluded. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None