OBJECTIVE There is a lack of evidence of how back muscle strength changes after lumbar fusion surgery and how exercise influences these changes. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in back muscle strength after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and to measure the effects of a postoperative exercise program on muscle strength and physical and mental health outcomes. METHODS This prospective study enrolled 59 women (mean age 58 years) who underwent PLIF at 1 or 2 spinal levels. To assess the effects of a supervised lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE), the authors allocated the patients to an LSE (n = 26) or a control (n = 33) group. The patients in the LSE group performed the LSEs between 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Back extensor strength, visual analog scale (VAS) scores in back pain, and physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores on the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey were determined for the both groups. RESULTS Mean strength of the back muscles tended to slightly decrease by 7.5% from preoperatively to 3 months after PLIF (p = 0.145), but it significantly increased thereafter and was sustained until the last follow-up (38.1%, p < 0.001). The mean back muscle strength was similar in the LSE and control groups preoperatively, but it increased significantly more in the LSE group (64.2%) than in the control group (21.7%) at the last follow-up 12 months after PLIF (p = 0.012). At the last follow-up, decreases in back pain VAS scores were more significant among LSE group patients, who had a pain reduction on average of 58.2%, than among control group patients (reduction of 26.1%) (p = 0.013). The patients in the LSE group also had greater improvement in both PCS (39.9% improvement) and MCS (20.7% improvement) scores than the patients in the control group (improvement of 18.0% and 1.1%, p = 0.042 and p = 0.035, respectively). CONCLUSIONS After PLIF, strength in back muscles decreased until 3 months postoperatively but significantly increased after that period. The patients who regularly underwent postoperative LSE had significantly improved back strength, less pain, and less functional disability at 12 months postoperatively.

There is a lack of evidence on the effect of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR) in patients treated with total thoracoscopic ablation (TTA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Our study investigated the efficacy and safety of postoperative exercise intervention in patients recovering from TTA. Twenty-four patients participated in the study, and were divided into the two groups, exercise group (EG) (n=12) and control group (n= 12). Patients in EG performed the exercise intervention including the aerobic and resistance exercise program twice a week for 8 weeks, which was used as a hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation for the out-patient. A cardiopulmonary exercise test was administered to evaluate aerobic exercise capacity, and qualitative aspect of patient’s life was assessed using the Short Form 36 questionnaires to compare pre and postoperative wellness of patient’s life. Although there was an increase of VO 2peak (peak oxygen uptake) after exercise intervention, no significant improvement was found ( P =0.055). Two of 4 physical health scores (role-physical, P =0.013 and general health, P =0.05) and three of four mental health scores (vitality, P =0.027, social function, P =0.016, and mental health, P =0.003) were significantly improved after 8 weeks of EBCR. Each summarized scale in the physical ( P =0.022) and mental ( P = 0.004) survey section was also significantly improved in postoperative assessment compared to the preoperative one. In this context, we concluded that EBCR initiated at the time point of 4th week after TTA operation can guarantee the secure postoperative physical activity, and the 8 weeks of EBCR can effectively improve the quality of life in AF Patients.

Background: Exercise intensity in exercise training programs is an important determinant of program efficacy, such as improvement in exercise capacity and quality of life (QOL). It is not well known whether differently applied exercise intensities are efficacious when used in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).Methods: Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL) were searched with the following inclusion criteria: comparative study of exercise interventions for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Three clinical specialists (a physician, nurse, and exercise physiologist) selected the included articles using the process of systematic review. Included articles were grouped according to aerobic exercise intensity: low, moderate-tovigorous, and vigorous. The level of evidence for each study was rated using Sackett's levels of evidence.Results: Of 1,452 studies reviewed, 8 were included according to the inclusion criteria (3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 3 prospective studies, and 2 case series). Exercise capacity for a six-minute walk distance (mean: 57.7 m) and QOL improved in the above moderate intensity group, while the low intensity group did not show improvement after intervention. For termination criteria, data obtained from the reviewed articles were not sufficient to suggest any exercise intensity recommendations for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Conclusions:The findings in this study suggest that at least moderate aerobic exercise intensity is needed to significantly improve six-minute walk distance and QOL in individuals diagnosed with World Health Organization Group 1 of pulmonary arterial hypertension. There is a need for prospective RCTs comparing different exercise intensities in this patient population.