Adhering to standard precautions is a key factor in reducing the risk of infection among nurses and nursing students. This study identified nursing students’ compliance with standard precautions and the factors associated with their compliance. This descriptive survey included 176 nursing students from a regional nursing college. Compliance with standard precautions was assessed using a 20-item questionnaire. Data were analysed using t-tests, a one-way analysis of variance, and a multiple regression analysis. Participants’ overall compliance rate was 50.5%. Concerning general characteristics, significant differences were found regarding needle-stick or sharps injuries, practicum department (surgical and paediatric), and type of contact (faeces). Needle-stick or sharps injury experience (β = -0.225) and surgery practicum department (β = 0.182; Adj R² = 0.063; p = 0.001) had a significant effect on compliance level. Standard precautions should be emphasized in the nursing curricula, along with systematic continuing education. Educational programs for needle-stick or sharps injury prevention should also be included in standard precautions curricula.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore cancer center nurses experience of infection control.Methods: From March 26 to 2019 to May 1, 2019 data were collected through focus group interviews and in-depth interviews. Data collected though interviews and field notes were analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method. Participants were 12 registered nurses and 2 head nurses.Results: Fifteen themes emerged from four themes clusters. 1) Encountering barriers to infection control. 2) Infection control is still difficult. 3) Complaints about Infection Control Department exist. 4) Need to consider strategies for improving infection control.Conclusion: The results of the study indicate that in order to facilitate infection control and increase the compliance rate of the guidelines, it is necessary to develop a program to increase the individual's competency associated with infection control and the elimination of negative factors. Further, mediation of external factors related to the hospital environment is necessary.

Objectives Debriefing is the core of simulation education that helps learners to meaningfully structure their experience. A valid and reliable scale capable of evaluating debriefing in Korean culture is required. This study translated the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH), into Korean, and analyzed its validity and reliability. Methods A total of 66 participants from nursing colleges in 3 different regions evaluated the tools and 4 participated via in-depth interviews. Results A one-factor model showed acceptable fit indices (χ2=20.21, χ2/df=2.25, comparative fit index=.95, standardized root mean square residual=.05, normed fit index=.91, tucker-lewis index=.92, root mean square error of approximation=.15). Via in-depth interviews, using K-DASH was identified to helped in successful debriefing. Cronbach’s α was .94. Conclusions This study demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability of K-DASH and its introduction into the Korean simulation curriculum can improve the efficacy of simulation education.