We evaluated the safety and feasibility of ultrasound-guided peripherally-inserted central venous catheters (PICC) by a neurointensivist at the bedside compared to fluoroscopy-guided PICC and conventional central venous catheter (CCVC). This was a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent central line placement and were admitted to the neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2014 and March 2018. In this study, the primary endpoint was central line-induced complications. The secondary endpoint was initial success of central line placement. Placements of ultrasound-guided PICC and CCVC performed at the bedside if intra-hospital transport was inappropriate. Other patients underwent PICC placement at the interventional radiology suite under fluoroscopic guidance. A total of 191 patients underwent central line placement in the neurosurgery ICU during the study period. Requirement for central line infusion (56.0%) and difficult venous access (28.8%) were the most common reasons for central line placement. The basilic vein (39.3%) and the subclavian vein (35.1%) were the most common target veins among patients who underwent central line placement. The placements of ultrasound-guided PICC and CCVC at the bedside were more frequently performed in patients on mechanical ventilation ( p = 0.001) and with hemodynamic instability ( p <0.001) compared to the fluoroscopy-guided PICC placement. The initial success rate of central line placement was better in the fluoroscopy-guided PICC placement than in the placements of ultrasound-guided PICC and CCVC at the bedside ( p = 0.004). However, all re-inserted central lines were successful. There was no significant difference in procedure time between the three groups. However, incidence of insertional injuries was higher in CCVC group compared to PICC groups ( p = 0.038). Ultrasound-guided PICC placement by a neurointensivist may be safe and feasible compared to fluoroscopy-guided PICC placement by interventional radiologists and CCVC placement for neurocritically ill patients.
Background We evaluated the role of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) using brain computed tomography (CT) in predicting neurological outcomes of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Methods This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of adult patients with SAH admitted between January 2012 and June 2017. Initial brain CT was performed within 12 h from onset of SAH, and follow-up brain CT was performed within 24 h from treatment of a ruptured aneurysm. Primary outcome was neurological status at 6-month follow-up assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS, 1 to 5). Results Among 223 SAH patients, 202 (90.6%) survived until discharge. Of these survivors, 186 (83.4%) manifested favorable neurological outcomes (GOS of 3, 4, or 5). In this study, the ONSDs in the group of patients with poor neurological outcome were significantly greater than those in the favorable neurological outcome group (all p < 0.01). Intracranial pressure (ICP) was monitored in 21 (9.4%) patients during the follow-up CT. A linear correlation existed between the average ONSD and ICP in simple correlation analysis ( r = 0.525, p = 0.036). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of poor neurological outcome showed that ONSD had considerable predictive value ( C -statistics, 0.735 to 0.812). In addition, the performance of a composite of Hunt and Hess grade and ONSD was increasingly associated with poor neurological outcomes than the use of each marker alone. Conclusions ONSD measured with CT may be used in combination with clinical grading scales to improve prognostic accuracy in SAH patients.
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in predicting neurological outcomes of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Methods: In this retrospective, observational study of adult patients with SAH treated between January 2012 and June 2017. Initial CRP levels collected within 24 h from the onset of SAH, the follow-up CRP levels were measured. The primary outcome was neurological status at six-month follow-up assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS, 1 to 5). Results: Among 156 patients with SAH, 145 (92.9%) survived until discharge. Of these survivors, 109 (69.9%) manifested favorable neurological outcomes (GOS of 4 or 5). Initial CRP levels on admission and maximal CRP levels within four days were significantly higher in the group with poor neurological outcome compared with those manifesting favorable neurological outcomes (P = 0.022, P < 0.001, respectively). However, the clearance of CRPs did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.785). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of poor neurological outcome showed that the performance of the maximal CRP was significantly better compared with the initial CRP or the clearance of CRP (P = 0.007, P < 0.001, respectively). In this study, the effect of CRP on neurological outcomes differed according to surgical clipping. The maximal CRP levels within four days facilitate the prediction of neurological outcomes of SAH patients without surgical clipping (C-statistic: 0.856, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.767-0.921). However, they were poorly associated with neurological prognoses in SAH patients who underwent surgical clipping (C-statistic: 0.562, 95% CI: 0.399-0.716). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that age (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.052-1.158), initial Glasgow Coma Scale (adjusted OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.647-0.837), and maximal CRP without surgical clipping (adjusted OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.066-1.516) (Continued on next page) (Continued from previous page) were significantly associated with poor neurological outcomes in SAH patients. Conclusions: Early serial measurements of CRP may be used to predict neurological outcomes of SAH patients. Furthermore, maximal CRP levels within four days post-SAH are significantly correlated with poor neurological outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.