No abstract

Perforation of the gastrointestinal tract by ingested foreign bodies is extremely rare in otherwise healthy patients, accounting for < 1% of cases. Accidentally ingested foreign bodies could cause small bowel perforation through a hernia sac, Meckel's diverticulum, or the appendix, all of which are uncommon. Despite their sharp ends and elongated shape, bowel perforation caused by ingested fish bones is rarely reported, particularly in patients without intestinal disease. We report a case of 57-year-old female who visited the emergency room with periumbilical pain and no history of underlying intestinal disease or intra-abdominal surgery. Abdominal computed tomography and exploratory laparotomy revealed a small bowel micro-perforation with a 2.7-cm fish bone penetrating the jejunal wall.

No abstract

PurposeVarious complications occur when a maxillofacial fracture is malunionized or improperly resolved. Malocclusion is the most common complication, followed by facial deformity, temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD), and neurological symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental treatment of postoperative complications after maxillofacial fracture.Materials and methodsIn this study, nine patients with a postoperative complication after maxillofacial fracture who had been performed the initial operation from other units and were referred to the authors’ department had been included. Of the nine patients, six had mandibular fractures, one had maxillary fractures, one had maxillary and mandibular complex fractures, and one had multiple facial fractures. All the patients had tooth fractures, dislocations, displacements, and alveolar bone fractures at the time of trauma, but complications occurred because none of the patients underwent preoperative and postoperative dental treatment. Malocclusion and TMD are the most common complications, followed by dental problems (pulp necrosis, tooth extrusion, osteomyelitis, etc.) due to improper treatment of teeth and alveolar bone injuries. The patients were referred to the department of dentistry to undergo treatment for the complications. One of the nine patients underwent orthognathic surgery for a severe open bite. Another patient underwent bone reconstruction using an iliac bone graft and vestibuloplasty with extensive bone loss. The other patients, who complained of moderate occlusal abnormalities and TMDs such as mouth-opening limitation, underwent occlusal treatment by prosthodontic repair and temporomandibular joint treatment instead of surgery.ResultsOne patient who underwent orthognathic surgery had complete loss of open bite and TMD after surgery. One patient who underwent reconstruction using an iliac bone graft had a good healing process. Other patients were treated with splint, injection, and physical therapy for mouth-opening limitation and temporomandibular joint pain. After treatment, the TMDs were resolved, but the remaining occlusal abnormalities were resolved with prosthetic restoration.ConclusionsConsidering the severity of malocclusion and TMJ symptom and the feasibillity of reoperation, nonsurgical methods such as orthodontic and prosthodontic treatments and splint therapy can be used to manage the dental and TMD complication after the trauma surgery. However, reoperation needs to be strongly considered for severe malocclusion and TMD problem.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s40902-018-0167-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objective Helicobacter pylori (HP) is known to play an important role in the development of gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of HP eradication on the survival rate and cancer recurrence in patients who underwent subtotal gastrectomy for GC. Design Totally 1,031 patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma who received surgical treatment at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2003 to 2017 and positive for HP infection were analyzed. The overall and GC-related survival according to HP eradication were compared; risk factors for GC-specific death and cancer recurrence were analyzed, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Results Statistically significant benefits of overall and GC-specific survival were observed in the eradicated group compared to the non-eradicated group (P < 0.001), and these benefits were maintained after PSM (P < 0.001) in both of early and advance stage. In Cox proportional hazards multivariate analyses, cancer stage (stage II, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 9.33, P < 0.001; stage III or IV, aHR = 26.17, P < 0.001), and HP positivity (aHR = 3.41, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for GC-specific death; cancer stage (cancer stage II, aHR = 7.08, P < 0.001; cancer stage III or IV, aHR = 19.64, P < 0.001) and HP positivity (aHR = 2.70; P = 0.005) were independent risk factors for cancer recurrence. Conclusion Our results suggest that HP needed to be conducted more intensively in patients who are surgically treated for GC, regardless of cancer stage.