Chronic liver disease (CLD) patients have higher mortality and hospitalization rates after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study aimed to explore SARS-CoV-2 vaccine perceptions, side effects, factors associated with nonvaccination and attitudes toward fourth-dose vaccine among CLD patients. The differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups among 1491 CLD patients and the risk factors associated with nonvaccination status were analyzed. In total, 1239 CLD patients were immunized against SARS-CoV-2. CLD patients have a high level of trust in the government and clinicians and were likely to follow their recommendations for vaccination. Reasons reported for nonvaccination were mainly concerns about the vaccines affecting their ongoing treatments and the fear of adverse events. However, only 4.84% of patients reported mild side effects. Risk factors influencing nonvaccination included being older in age, having cirrhosis, receiving treatments, having no knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine considerations and not receiving doctors’ positive advice on vaccination. Furthermore, 20.6% of completely vaccinated participants refused the fourth dose because they were concerned about side effects and believed that the complete vaccine was sufficiently protective. Our study proved that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were safe for CLD patients. Our findings suggest that governments and health workers should provide more SARS-CoV-2 vaccination information and customize strategies to improve vaccination coverage and enhance vaccine protection among the CLD population.

Relapsing polychondritis (RP) is a rare inflammatory disease with significant individual heterogeneity that involves systemic organs. The diagnosis of RP mainly depends on the clinical manifestations; currently, there are no molecular biomarkers routinely evaluated in clinical practice. Biomarkers have diagnostic or monitoring values and can predict response to treatment or the disease course. Over the years, many biomarkers have been proposed to facilitate diagnosis and prognosis. Unfortunately, ideal biomarkers to diagnose RP have not yet been discovered. Most of the molecular biomarkers in RP are immunological biomarkers, with autoantibodies and proteins related to cartilage damage in the blood being the most common. Alterations in some genes (HLA typing and UBA1 somatic mutation) were detected in patients with RP, which could serve as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of RP. Moreover, proinflammatory cytokine and lymphocyte levels, and certain laboratory tests, have certain values of RP diagnosis and disease activity assessment but lack specificity and sensitivity. This review describes the different types of biomarkers and their clinical correlation with respect to the diagnosis of RP and disease activity. Research on biomarkers and disease pathology is ongoing to identify the ideal biomarkers that are sensitive and specific for RP.