Objective. To explore the application value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating free DNA (cfDNA) from peripheral blood in the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Here, we measured CTCs and cfDNA quantity for predicting the outcome of patients. Patients and Methods. Forty-five patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical treatment were enrolled in this study. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel + S-1 + oxaliplatin (PSOX) regimen, and CTCs and cfDNA of the peripheral blood were detected before and after neoadjuvant therapy. Relationships between the number/type of CTC or cfDNA and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed. Results. Among 45 patients, 43 (95.6%) were positive, and the positive rate of mesenchymal CTC was increased with the increase in the T stage. The proportion of mesenchymal CTC was positively correlated with the N stage ( P < 0.05 ), and the larger N stage will have the higher proportion of mesenchymal CTC. Patients with a small number of mesenchymal CTC before neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to achieve partial response (PR) with neoadjuvant therapy. Patients with positive CA-199 were more likely to achieve PR with neoadjuvant therapy ( P < 0.05 ). Patients in the PR group were more likely to have decreased/unchanged cfDNA concentration after neoadjuvant therapy ( P = 0.119 ). After neoadjuvant therapy (before surgery), the cfDNA concentration was higher and the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (SD or PD) was lower ( P = 0.045 ). Conclusions. Peripheral blood CTC, especially interstitial CTC and cfDNA, has a certain value in predicting the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.

Aim: To explore the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel+oxaliplatin+S-1 (PSOX), docetaxel+oxaliplatin+fluorouracil (DOF) and oxaliplatin+S-1 (SOX) regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (GC). Methods: A retrospective analysis was used in 306 patients with GC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of 102 from the PSOX group, 100 from the DOF group and 104 from the SOX group. Results: The total effective rates and disease control rates for the PSOX, DOF and SOX groups were 31.4, 18 and 16.3% and 96.1, 94 and 92.3%, respectively. The highest total effective rate and disease control rate were found in the PSOX groups. Moreover, no difference among the PSOX, DOF and SOX groups on the incidence of adverse events was observed (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The PSOX regimen is an alternative neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for GC patients.

No abstract