<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Despite complete recanalization by mechanical thrombectomy, abnormal perfusion can be detected on MRI obtained post-endovascular therapy (EVT). The presence of residual perfusion abnormalities post-EVT may be associated with blood-brain barrier breakdown in response to mechanical disruption of the endothelium from multiple-pass thrombectomy. We hypothesize that multiple-pass versus single-pass thrombectomy is associated with a higher rate of residual hypoperfusion and increased lesion growth at 24 h. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> For this analysis, we included patients presenting to one of two stroke centers between January 2015 and February 2018 with an acute ischemic stroke within 12 h from symptom onset if they had a large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation documented on magnetic resonance angiography or CTA, baseline MRI pre-EVT with imaging evidence of hypoperfusion, underwent EVT, and had a post-EVT MRI with qualitatively interpretable perfusion-weighted imaging data at 24 h. MRI <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> maps using a time delay threshold of >6 s were used to quantitate hypoperfusion volumes. Residual hypoperfusion at 24 h was solely defined as <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> volume >10 mL with >6 s delay. Complete recanalization was defined as modified treatment in cerebral infarction visualized on angiography at EVT completion. Hyperintense acute reperfusion injury marker was assessed on post-EVT pre-contrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery at 24 h. Major early neurological improvement was defined as a reduction of the admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale by ≥8 points or a score of 0–1 at 24 h. Good functional outcome was defined as 0–2 on the modified Rankin Scale on day 30 or 90. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Fifty-five patients were included with median age 67 years, 58% female, 45% Black/African American, 36% White/Caucasian, median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 19, large vessel occlusion locations: 71% M1, 14.5% iICA, 14.5% M2, 69% treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. Of these, 58% had multiple-pass thrombectomy, 39% had residual perfusion abnormalities at 24 h, and 64% had severe hyperintense acute reperfusion injury marker at 24 h. After adjusting for complete recanalization, only multiple-pass thrombectomy (odds ratio, 4.3 95% CI, 1.07–17.2; <i>p</i> = 0.04) was an independent predictor of residual hypoperfusion at 24 h. Patients with residual hypoperfusion had larger lesion growth on diffusion-weighted imaging (59 mL vs. 8 mL, <i>p</i> < 0.001), lower rate of major early neurological improvement (24% vs. 70%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) at 24 h, and worse long-term outcome based on the modified Rankin Scale at 30 or 90 days, 5 versus 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our findings suggest that incomplete reperfusion on post-EVT MRI is present even in some patients with successful recanalization at the time of EVT and is associated with multiple-pass thrombectomy, lesion growth, and worse outcome. Future studies are needed to investigate whether patients with residual hypoperfusion may benefit from immediate adjunctive therapy to limit lesion growth and improve clinical outcome.
Dosing cefepime for renal function does not completely prevent neurotoxicity in a kidney transplant patient. Cefepime neurotoxicity has been reported primarily among patients with renal insufficiency who received standard doses of the antibiotic. We report a case of nonconvulsive status epilepticus from dose-adjusted cefepime in a kidney transplant patient. The timing of symptoms along with clinical and electroencephalographic improvement after discontinuation of cefepime was critical to the diagnosis. Whether we should adjust the dose of cefepime differently in a patient with transplanted kidney to prevent neurotoxicity is unknown.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.