Conversion therapy gives some patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) access to surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hepatectomy after conversion therapy and how it differed from those who undergoing direct hepatectomy. Patients and Methods: From January 2018 to April 2022, 745 patients underwent hepatectomy for HCC were enrolled. Among them, 41 patients of unresectable HCC underwent hepatectomy after conversion therapy. A demographically and clinically comparable cohort was created from the remaining patients in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. Results:The median duration of conversion therapy was 108 (42-298) days, 8 patients achieved complete response (CR) and 33 achieved partial response (PR). Conversion therapy resulted in some degree of myelosuppression, but liver function index remained good. Compared with the direct hepatectomy group, the conversion group had more blood loss (600 mL vs 400 mL, p=0.015), longer operative time (270 min vs 240 min, p=0.02), higher blood transfusion rates, and longer hospital stay (8 days vs 11 days, p<0.001). Patients in the conversion group had significantly more complications of any grade (82.9% vs 51.2%, p=0.002) and grade 3/4 (26.8% vs 4.9%, p=0.013), and 6 patients developed post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). There were no deaths in either group. All patients achieved R0 resection, 6 (6/41, 14.6%) achieved pathological complete response (pCR), 14 achieved major pathologic responses (MPR). During a median follow-up of 12.8 months, 14 patients in the conversion group experienced recurrence or metastasis, no deaths. Conclusion: Hepatectomy after conversion therapy was more difficult than direct hepatectomy, but accurate preoperative assessment could ensure the safety of the surgery. The damage of liver function after conversion therapy was more severe than expected, PHLF should be prevented and treated. Hepatectomy was effective and necessary, postoperative pathological examination could provide guidance for adjuvant therapy.

Background The survival benefit of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the survival efficacy of adjuvant TACE after hepatectomy for HCC. Methods 1491 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy between January 2018 and September 2021 at four medical centers in China were retrospectively analyzed, including 782 patients who received adjuvant TACE and 709 patients who did not receive adjuvant TACE. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was performed to minimize selection bias, which balanced the clinical characteristics of the two groups. Results A total of 1254 patients were enrolled after PSM, including 627 patients who received adjuvant TACE and 627 patients who did not receive adjuvant TACE. Patients who received adjuvant TACE had higher disease-free survival (DFS, 1- ,2-, and 3-year: 78%-68%-62% vs. 69%-57%-50%, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, 1- ,2-, and 3-year: 96%-88%-80% vs. 90%-77%-66%, p < 0.001) than those who did not receive adjuvant TACE (Median DFS was 39 months). Among the different levels of risk factors affecting prognosis [AFP, Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, Maximum tumor diameter, Number of tumors, Child-Pugh classification, Liver cirrhosis, Vascular invasion (imaging), Microvascular invasion, Satellite nodules, Differentiation, Chinese liver cancer stage II-IIIa], the majority of patients who received adjuvant TACE had higher DFS or OS than those who did not receive adjuvant TACE. More patients who received adjuvant TACE accepted subsequent antitumor therapy such as liver transplantation, re-hepatectomy and local ablation after tumor recurrence, while more patients who did not receive adjuvant TACE accepted subsequent antitumor therapy with TACE after tumor recurrence (All p < 0.05). Conclusions Adjuvant TACE may be a potential way to monitor early tumor recurrence and improve postoperative survival in patients with HCC.

Background:We aimed to investigate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolisation (PA-TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated by microvascular invasion (MVI). Methods:A retrospective analysis of 1505 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy at four medical centers, including 782 patients who received PA-TACE and 723 patients who did not receive adjuvant PA-TACE, has been conducted. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was performed on the data to minimise selection bias, which resulted in a balanced clinical profile between groups.Results: After PSM, 620 patients who received PA-TACE and 620 patients who did not receive PA-TACE were included. Disease-free survival (DFS, 1-, 2-, and 3-year: 88%-68%-61% vs. 70%-58%-51%, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, 1-, 2-, and 3year: 96%-89%-82% vs. 89%-77%-67%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients who received PA-TACE than in those who did not. Patients with MVI who received PA-TACE had significantly higher DFS (1-, 2-, and 3-year: 68%-57%-48% vs. 46%-31%-27%, p < 0.001) and OS (1-, 2-, and 3-year: 96%-84%-77% vs. 79%-58%-40%, p < 0.001) than those who did not receive PA-TACE. Among the six different liver cancer stages, MVI-negative patients did not have significant survival outcomes from PA-TACE (p > 0.05), whereas MVI-positive patients achieved higher DFS and OS from it (p < 0.05). Liver dysfunction, fever, and nausea/vomiting were the most common adverse events in patients receiving PA-TACE. There was no significant difference in grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions:Postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolisation has a good safety profile and may be a potentially beneficial treatment modality for survival outcomes in patients with HCC, especially those with concomitant MVI.