The alternate arm converter (AAC) is an emerging state-of-the-art topology for voltage-source converter (VSC) by combining two-level converter and modular multilevel converter (MMC). The AAC performs better than the MMC in terms of the ability to block DC-side faults and ride through AC-side faults. Moreover, the number of sub-modules (SMs) per arm of the AAC is reduced by about 50% compared with the MMC. The key issue with AAC is the energy deviation during the alternate operation between the upper and lower arms. Presently, several AAC balancing techniques have been proposed, but no comparative analysis has been performed to provide insight on the effect of each balancing technique on AAC performance. In this study, five proposed balancing techniques are reviewed accordingly, followed by comparing them in terms of four parameters-the presence of DC filter, balancing capability, the presence of redundant SMs and zero-current switching control. Furthermore, a simulation work has been performed to study and compare the effects of each of the five balancing techniques. Both literature and simulation-based comparative analysis are significant to help select appropriate balancing technique as well as to provide helpful insights to improve the existing balancing techniques.

No abstract

Multilevel voltage source converters (VSCs), such as modular multilevel converter (MMC), cascaded H-Bridge (CHB) and alternate arm converter (AAC), are competent topologies for battery energy storage systems (BESSs) due to modularity, scalability and low harmonic distortion. However, there is a lack of studies about interfacing AAC with a BESS due to the arm energy balancing issue. Redundant sub-modules (SMs) are inserted passively into MMC, CHB and AAC to achieve high reliability; consequently, some of them are constantly idling, resulting in low SM utilization. We propose a novel topology -T-shaped hybrid alternate arm converter (TSHAAC) for BESS applications. In addition to the aforementioned features, the proposed TSHAAC requires lower number of SMs than MMC and AAC, along with lower number of switches than CHB. Moreover, an adapted arm energy balancing control is proposed to take advantage of the redundant SMs that are idling to achieve faster balancing than in conventional AAC configuration. The simulation results validate the integration of TSHAAC configuration in a BESS; the adapted arm energy balancing control is able to improve the balancing duration by 27 %.