AIM:To determine the prevalence and risk factors o f w o r k-r e l a t e d m u s c u l o s k e l e t a l d i s o r d e r s i n gastrointestinal endoscopists in Korea. METHODS: A survey of musculoskeletal symptoms, using a self-administered questionnaire, was conducted on 55 endoscopists practicing in general hospitals or health promotion centers. RESULTS: Forty-nine (89.1%) endoscopists reported musculoskeletal pain on at least one anatomic location and 37 (67.3%) endoscopists complained of pain at rest. Twenty-six (47.3%) endoscopists had severe musculoskeletal pain defined as a visual analogue score greater than 5.5. Factors related to the development of severe pain were (1) standing position during upper endoscopy, (2) specific posture/ habit during endoscopic procedures, and (3) multiple symptomatic areas. Finger pain was more common in beginners, whereas shoulder pain was more common in experienced endoscopists. Sixteen percent of symptomatic endoscopists have modified their practice or reduced the number of endoscopic examinations. Only a few symptomatic endoscopists had sought professional consultation with related specialists. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in endoscopists is very high. The location of pain was different between beginners and experienced endoscopists. Measures for the prevention and a d e q u a t e m a n a g e m e n t o f e n d o s c o p y-r e l a t e d musculoskeletal symptoms are necessary.

BackgroundThe introduction of FOLFIRINOX regimen greatly changed the treatment for advanced pancreatic cancers. However, detailed studies on the clinical effects and factors affecting the prognosis are insufficient. We performed this study to evaluate the effects of FOLFIRINOX and the surgical resection in advanced pancreatic cancer.MethodsThree hundred and thirty‐seven patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who initially received FOLFIRINOX, from January 2011 to December 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were evaluated according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline, responses after four to six cycles of FOLFIRINOX were re‐evaluated according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, and further treatment was decided in the multidisciplinary meeting.ResultsSixty‐seven (19.9%) patients had borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, 135 (40.1%) locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and 135 (40.1%) metastatic pancreatic cancer. The median survival period was significantly longer in the surgical group than in the nonsurgical group in each clinical stage, even in metastatic pancreatic cancer (32 vs. 14, P = 0.012). In multivariate analysis, metastatic status at diagnosis, progressive disease after FOLFIRINOX, surgical resection, and declined CA19‐9 after FOLFIRINOX were significant prognostic factors.ConclusionsSurgical treatment greatly affects survival outcomes in advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX. Further studies on the optimal indication of operation and the protocol are needed.

Most small subepithelial lesions do not change as shown by endoscopic examination, and regular follow-up with endoscopy may be considered in small, subepithelial lesions, especially lesions < 1 cm in size.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are useful biomarkers of many solid tumors, but are infrequently detected in early stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). The first drainage of pancreatic venous blood flow come to portal vein and pass through the liver, and they finally go out for peripheral blood. We thought that comparing CTCs from portal vein and peripheral blood could enable us to understand the clinical meaning of CTCs from each different site in PDACs. Therefore, we aimed to determine 1) whether CTCs could be reliably identified in early stages (operable) of PDACs, 2) if there are any differences in the detected number of CTC in portal vein blood and peripheral blood, and 3) whether CTCs can be sensitive biomarkers for the prognosis of resectable PDAC patients. Newly diagnosed PDAC patients who underwent operation with curative intention between 2013 and 2015 were prospectively enrolled. Blood draws from portal and peripheral vein ran through the microfabricated porous filter, and anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and anti-Plectin-1 antibodies were used for CTC identification. Baseline clinical characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes were assessed. The clinical stages of the 32 enrolled patients were as follows: IA/IB 1 (3.1%); IIA 9 (28.1%); IIB 17 (53.1%); III 5 (15.6%). Twenty-seven patients (84.4%) received R0 resection, while five patients (15.6%) received R1 resection. EpCAM+ CTCs were detected in 20 portal blood (62.5%) and 22 peripheral blood (68.8%). Plectin-1+ CTCs were identified in 14 portal blood (43.8%) and 16 peripheral blood (50%). Plectin-1-expressing CTCs were picked from CTC platform (microfabricated porous filter) and we could find out all KRAS mutation. Patients with detectable EpCAM+ CTC less than one in peripheral blood showed longer overall survival (OS) compared to patients with detectable CTCs more than one (35.5 months vs. 16.0 months). EpCAM and Plectin-1 successfully identified CTCs at the early stage of PDACs. Also, the number of CTCs could be a prognostic marker for survival in resectable PDACs.

No abstract