~S-cysteine injected adjacent to the supraoptic nucleus (SON) of the rat is rapidly incorporated into proteins. These 35S-cysteine-labeled proteins in the SON (1-24 h after injection) were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the distribution of radioactive proteins on the gels was analyzed. 1 h after injection, about 73% of the radioactivity appeared in two peaks (both about 20,000 mol wt). With time, these peaks (putative precursors of neurophysin) decreased, as a 12,000 mol wt peak (containing two distinct neurophysins) increased in radioactivity. Both the 20,000-and 12,000-mol wt proteins are transported into the axonal (median eminence) and nerve terminal (posterior pituitary) regions of the rat hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system. Conversion of the larger precursor protein to the smaller neurophysin appears to occur, in large part, intra-axonally during axonal transport. Six distinct aSS-cysteine-labeled peptides (< 2500 mol wt), in addition to arginine vasopressin and oxytocin, are also synthesized in the SON and transported to the posterior pituitary where they are released together with labeled neurophysin by potassium depolarization in the presence of extracellular calcium. These data provide support for the hypothesis that the neurohypophysial peptides (vasopressin and oxytocin) and neurophysins are derived from the post-translational cleavage of protein precursors synthesized in the SON, and that the conversion process can occur in the neurosecretory granule during axonal transport.The question whether neuronal peptides are synthesized by ribosomal mechanisms as protein precursors and then transformed to biologically active peptides by post-translational cleavage mechanisms, similar to those for insulin (47), or by direct enzymic (synthetase) mechanisms has received considerable attention in recent years (38). The answer to this question has several implications with regard to the cell biology of "peptidergic" neurons, i.e., neurons which synthesize and store specific peptides for release as intercellular messengers (3,13,30). Since ribosomes appear to be restricted to the neuron perikaryon (21), ribosomal mechanisms of peptide biosynthesis and their regulation would necessarily have to occur at this site in the neuron. In contrast, an enzymic mechanism of biosynthesis would allow these processes to occur in any part of the neuron (e.g., the axon terminal), analogous to the synthesis of conventional neurotransmitters (e.g., acetylcholine, gamma aminobutyric acid, catecholamines, etc.).
[35S]Cysteine injected adjacent to the supraoptic nucleus of the rat is rapidly incorporated into a 20,000-dalton protein that, in time, is converted to a 12,000-dalton labeled protein, neurophysin. This putative precursor of neurophysin appears to be synthesized in the supraoptic nucleus and transformed to neurophysin and related peptides during axonal transport to the neurohypophysis.
Cannabinoids, such as the delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), present in the cannabis plant, as well as anandamide and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol, produced by the mammalian body, have been shown to protect the brain from various insults and to improve several neurodegenerative diseases. The current review summarizes the evidence for cannabinoid neuroprotection in vivo, and refers to recent in vitro studies, which help elucidate possible molecular mechanisms underlying this protective effect. Some of these mechanisms involve the activation of CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors, while others are not dependent on them. In some cases, protection is due to a direct effect of the cannabinoids on neuronal cells, while in others, it results from their effects on non-neuronal elements within the brain. In many experimental set-ups, cannabinoid neurotoxicity, particularly by THC, resides side by side with neuroprotection. The current review attempts to shed light on this dual activity, and to dissociate between the two contradictory effects.
Heavy use of marijuana is claimed to damage critical skills related to short-term memory, visual scanning and attention. Motor skills and driving safety may be compromised by the acute effects of marijuana. The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effects of 13 mg and 17 mg Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on skills important for coordinated movement and driving and on subjective and autonomic measures in regular users of marijuana. Fourteen regular users of marijuana were enrolled. Each subject was tested on two separate days. On each test day, subjects smoked two low-nicotine cigarettes, one with and the other without THC. Seventeen mg THC was included in the cigarette on one test day and 13 mg on the other day. The sequence of cigarette types was unknown to the subject. During smoking, heart rate and blood pressure were monitored, and the subjects performed a virtual reality maze task requiring attention and motor coordination, followed by 3 other cognitive tasks (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), a "gambling" task and estimation of time and distance from an approaching car). After smoking a cigarette with 17 mg THC, regular marijuana users hit the walls more often on the virtual maze task than after smoking cigarettes without THC; this effect was not seen in patients after they smoked cigarettes with 13 mg THC. Performance in the WCST was affected with 17 mg THC and to a lesser extent with the use of 13 mg THC. Decision making in the gambling task was affected after smoking cigarettes with 17 mg THC, but not with 13 m THC. Smoking cigarettes with 13 and 17 mg THC increased subjective ratings of pleasure and satisfaction, drug "effect" and drug "high". These findings imply that smoking of 17 mg THC results in impairment of cognitive-motor skills that could be important for coordinated movement and driving, whereas the lower dose of 13 mg THC appears to cause less impairment of such skills in regular users of marijuana.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.