No abstract

No abstract

The novel stem cell marker SALL4 has been identified as a diagnostic marker of germ cell tumors, especially yolk sac tumors, in gonadal organs. To clarify the significance of SALL4 as an oncofetal protein, we investigated SALL4 expression by immunohistochemistry in non-neoplastic stomach and gastric carcinoma with particular emphasis on á-fetoprotein (AFP)-producing gastric carcinoma, as AFP-producing gastric carcinoma shares expression of AFP and glypican 3 (GPC3) with yolk sac tumors and hepatic neoplasms. A total of 338 gastric carcinomas, 60 hepatocellular carcinomas, and 48 cholangiocellular carcinomas were studied by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. In addition, more detailed whole tissue section immunohistochemistry was performed on non-neoplastic gastric tissue from 5 adult and 8 fetal specimens, 6 hepatoblastomas, and 31 cases of AFP-producing gastric carcinomas. SALL4 expression was observed in the neofetal stomach in gestational week 9 and disappeared thereafter. It was also identified by tissue microarray study in a fraction of gastric carcinomas (51 of 338, 15%), associated with older age (P=0.0001), male sex (P=0.0033), intestinal-type histology (P=0.0001), and synchronous liver metastasis (P=0.0047). AFP and GPC3 were closely associated with SALL4 expression in gastric carcinoma (both, P<0.0001), and a full-section study indicated that SALL4 was positive in all 31 cases of AFP-producing gastric carcinoma with diffuse staining in 24 cases (78%). Diffuse SALL4 expression was observed in the histologic patterns of hepatoid (89%), glandular (57%), and clear cell (39%) AFP-producing gastric carcinoma. In addition, SALL4 expression was completely negative in hepatoblastoma (n=6) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n=60). SALL4 is an oncofetal protein similar to AFP and GPC3, but it represents fetal gut differentiation in gastric carcinoma. SALL4 is a sensitive marker for AFP-producing gastric carcinoma and is especially useful to distinguish hepatoid gastric carcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma.

No abstract

Background Although proximal gastrectomy (PG) is widely accepted as a function-preserving operation for early upper-third gastric cancer, postoperative disorders, such as reflux or gastric stasis, have often been pointed out. From the perspective of postoperative disorder, the choice of total gastrectomy (TG) or PG for such cancers is still controversial. By using the newly developed Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45, the quality of life after TG and PG was compared. Methods The PGSAS-45 consists of 45 items composed of the SF-8 and GSRS scales and 22 new items. The main outcomes are measured by seven subscales (SS) covering symptoms, physical and mental component summary (SF-8), meals (amount and quality), ability to work, dissatisfaction for daily life, and change in body weight. A total of 2,368 eligible questionnaires were acquired from 52 institutions. From these, 393 patients with TG and 193 patients with PG were selected and compared. Results The PG was better than TG in terms of body weight loss (TG 13.8 % vs. PG 10.9 %; p = 0.003), necessity for additional meals (2.4 vs. 2.0; p \ 0.001), diarrhea SS (2.3 vs. 2.0; p = 0.048), and dumping SS (2.3 vs. 2.0; p = 0.043). There were no differences in the other main outcome measures.Conclusions Proximal gastrectomy appears to be valuable as a function-preserving procedure for early upperthird gastric cancer.