Magnetic stimulation performed with a double-cone coil placed over appropriate positions on the back of the head reduced the size of electromyographic responses evoked by magnetic cortical stimulation in the first dorsal interosseous muscle when it preceded the cortical stimulus by 5, 6, and 7 msec. No suppression of responses to electrical cortical stimulation occurred. Greater suppression was evoked by stronger cerebellar stimuli; lesser suppression was elicited by stronger cortical stimuli. These physiological findings correspond to those obtained with electrical cerebellar stimulation. The most effective position for magnetic stimulation over the back of the head was slightly rostral to the foramen magnum level on the ipsilateral side of the muscle studied. This indicates that the conditioning stimulus activates certain structures at the back of the head on the ipsilateral side of the muscle, consistent with the cerebellum, because the part of the cerebellum regulating limb muscles is positioned about there on the ipsilateral side. In 2 patients with only cerebellar dysfunction, this suppression effect was not elicited, which also supports that the suppression is caused by activity in cerebellar structures. We conclude that magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum with a double-cone coil elicits the same suppressive effect on the motor cortex as electrical stimulation, but with less discomfort; moreover, we believe that this effect is produced by activation of certain cerebellar structures.

CAM includes clinicohistopathologically heterogeneous disease entities. Among CAM entities, anti-TIF1-γ-Ab(+) CAM has characteristically shown a close temporal association with cancer detection and the histopathologic findings of dC5b-9 and VFs, and CAM with NAM is a subset of anti-TIF1-γ-Ab(-) CAM.

Our study suggests that IFNβ-1b may trigger severe exacerbation in patients with the NMO spectrum. In INFβ-1b therapy, cases in NMO spectrum should be carefully excluded.

No abstract

Magnetic stimulation done with a double cone coil placed over the back of the head activated descending motor pathways and produced electromyographic responses in muscles of the arms and legs. The latencies of these responses were the same as those of responses to electrical brainstem stimulation. The threshold was lowest when the coil was placed over the inion or below it on the median line. Placement of the coil on the side ipsilateral to the muscle was more effective than placement on the contralateral side. These results indicate that activation occurs at the foramen magnum level (just below the pyramidal decussation). Collision experiments that used cortical and magnetic brainstem stimulation indicated that the major part of the responses to the latter stimulation were conducted via the large diameter component of the corticospinal tract. Collision experiments done with the peripheral nerve and magnetic brainstem stimulation showed that this stimulation produced a single descending volley in the descending tract. We conclude that magnetic brainstem stimulation produces a single descending volley in the corticospinal tract at the foramen magnum level with less discomfort.