No abstract

Metachronous gastric cancer (MGC) after endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric cancer still occurs to some degree even after Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment. We evaluated whether two biomarkers related to carcinogenesis expressed in intestinal metaplasia (IM) become predictors for MGC development after eradication. We performed a hospital-based, case-control study of 75 patients, including 50 mucosal cancer patients who had undergone ER (Group DYS), and 25 age- and sex-matched chronic gastritis patients for whom H. pylori had been successfully eradicated (control). Additionally, Group DYS patients were divided into 2 groups: 25 successfully H. pylori-eradicated (eradicated group) and 25 un-eradicated patients (persistent group). All patients were followed for 1 year. We analyzed microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunoperoxidase assays using a monoclonal antibody for the colonic phenotype (Das-1). Both MSI and Das-1 reactivity in IM were significantly higher in Group DYS than in the control (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). MSI and Das-1 reactivity were strong and independent predictors for gastric cancer (OR=7.09, 95% CI 1.27-39.6, p=0.03 for MSI and OR=4.96, 95% CI 1.64-15.0, p=0.005 for Das-1 reactivity). The incidence of MSI tended to decrease in the eradicated group (p=0.07), but not in the persistent group. The Das-1 immunoreactivity in IM also declined in both the eradicated group and the control. Interestingly, all MGCs after ER were positive for MSI or Das-1 reactivity. MSI or Das-1 reactivity in IM strongly predicts the development of MGC. Patients in whom these biomarkers persist after eradication may therefore have a high risk of developing MGC.

Cold polypectomy is a time-saving procedure for removing small polyps with markedly similar curability and safety to hot polypectomy.

Both AFI and NBI are considered to be feasible tools that can discriminate colon adenoma from hyperplastic polyps, and their use may be particularly beneficial for less-experienced endoscopists.

BackgroundSome patients under close colonoscopic surveillance still develop colorectal cancer, thus suggesting the overlook of colorectal adenoma by endoscopists. AFI detects colorectal adenoma as a clear magenta, therefore the efficacy of AFI is expected to improve the detection ability of colorectal adenoma. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of AFI in detecting colorectal adenoma.MethodsThis study enrolled 88 patients who underwent colonoscopy at Asahikawa Medical University and Kushiro Medical Association Hospital. A randomly selected colonoscopist first observed the sigmoid colon and rectum with conventional high resolution endosopy (HRE). Then the colonoscopist changed the mode to AFI and handed to the scope to another colonoscopist who knew no information about the HRE. Then the second colonoscopist observed the sigmoid colon and rectum. Each colonoscopist separately recorded the findings. The detection rate, miss rate and procedural time were assessed in prospective manner.ResultsThe detection rate of flat and depressed adenoma, but not elevated adenoma, by AFI is significantly higher than that by HRE. In less-experienced endoscopists, AFI dramatically increased the detection rate (30.3%) and reduced miss rate (0%) of colorectal adenoma in comparison to those of HRE (7.7%, 50.0%), but not for experienced endoscopists. The procedural time of HRE was significantly shorter than that of AFI.ConclusionsAFI increased the detection rate and reduced the miss rate of flat and depressed adenomas. These advantages of AFI were limited to less-experienced endoscopists because experienced endoscopists exhibited a substantially high detection rate for colorectal adenoma with HRE.